Based on the performance over the past decade, the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) has indeed outperformed the S&P 500 tracking fund (VOO). Based on this backtest conclusion, using the Nasdaq 100 as the main position when constructing an investment portfolio is more convincing.
Of course, if you want to strengthen exposure to the technology and AI sectors, you can also consider ETFs that specifically track AI and tech stocks. But from the perspective of convenience and liquidity, allocating to the Nasdaq 100 can save a lot of effort—its products are mature enough, holdings are sufficiently transparent, and choosing it as a core allocation is more worry-free in the long run.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 2h ago
The achievements of the past ten years do not guarantee the future; that logic is a bit risky.
View OriginalReply0
HashBard
· 2h ago
past performance is such a seductive narrative though... hindsight bias wrapped in a pretty backtest chart, ngl. the real question is whether tech's dominance story still holds when the liquidity tap finally closes for good
Based on the performance over the past decade, the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) has indeed outperformed the S&P 500 tracking fund (VOO). Based on this backtest conclusion, using the Nasdaq 100 as the main position when constructing an investment portfolio is more convincing.
Of course, if you want to strengthen exposure to the technology and AI sectors, you can also consider ETFs that specifically track AI and tech stocks. But from the perspective of convenience and liquidity, allocating to the Nasdaq 100 can save a lot of effort—its products are mature enough, holdings are sufficiently transparent, and choosing it as a core allocation is more worry-free in the long run.