Tech-focused crypto projects could really gain serious momentum if they committed to locking dev tokens for extended periods—say 6 months to a year—and maintained consistent public updates. Think about it: regular demos, feature releases, and transparent development roadmaps would shift market sentiment instantly. Yet somehow this remains surprisingly rare. The disconnect is wild: these fundamentals aren't complicated to execute. Regular updates. Developer transparency. Token commitments. So why do so many projects struggle with the basics? It's this gap between what builds real confidence and what actually gets implemented that keeps smaller cap projects underperforming.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastervip
· 11h ago
Exactly right, just poor execution.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictimvip
· 11h ago
Basically, all project teams just want to harvest the profits, no one really wants to do the work.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamervip
· 11h ago
Basically, it's just that the project team is too lazy.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfitvip
· 11h ago
Basically, most project teams are paper tigers; they make a bunch of promises verbally, but when it comes to execution, they fall flat.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)