2026-01-01 01:20:32

A fascinating phenomenon has been observed. When a major exchange's spot order book suddenly shows a large buy order of 26 million U, the underlying logic is often quite clear—first, build walls on the spot market to push the price up, then exit the futures market to harvest gains.

So I started paying attention to real-time changes in the order book, focusing on one thing: as long as this 26 million U buy order remains on the spot market without being withdrawn, the price of BROCCOLI714 will generally continue to rise. This is not a guess, but a pattern that can be directly observed from on-chain data and trading depth.

Big players' actions are often traceable. When you focus on changes in the order book's depth, those seemingly abrupt price fluctuations are actually telling a story. Monitoring this kind of liquidity accumulation allows you to anticipate the next market move.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

token_therapist

· 6h ago

Yeah, I've heard this set of explanations several times, but truly capable people who can consistently buy the dip are indeed few. --- The tactic of building walls and pulling up the market is too old; the key is to be quick—if you're slow, you'll just become the bagholder. --- That 26 million order probably left long ago. I see that the order book depth doesn't really follow any pattern. --- If the order book data is so useful, why do some people still lose money? --- Watching the order book sounds easy in theory, but if you do it every day, your eyes will probably go blind. --- It's interesting, but I still don't believe this can make stable profits. --- This logic sounds reasonable, but real trading is another story altogether. --- The order book does have reference value; it's just that the signals are so numerous that you become numb.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMaster

· 6h ago

Yeah, I've seen through this routine long ago—building walls, pulling up prices to trap retail investors, it's a well-worn tactic. But honestly, watching the order book is indeed a way to find opportunities in a bear market. I’ve made some extra profit from arbitrage splits using this method before. It's just exhausting, constantly watching it, like raising three kids—draining on your energy.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 6h ago

ngl this is just order book spoofing wrapped in "reading the tea leaves" vibes. the game theory breaks down the second they realize you're watching - then what? they pull it and you're bagholding BROCCOLI714 while they're already shorting on perps lmao

Reply0

AirdropChaser

· 6h ago

Damn, this technique is really ruthless. Building walls to manipulate the market and then using contracts to harvest retail investors—it's an old trick, brother. Is the order book really that obvious? How come I haven't noticed this pattern before? Can 26 million U.S. dollars really manipulate the price of a coin? That's a bit exaggerated, bro. Is this guy really watching the market closely or just a armchair strategist? What he's saying sounds pretty profound. Can liquidity accumulation be seen in advance? What kind of big player would be able to do that?

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 7h ago

26 million U buy orders get canceled with one withdrawal, and it should run away. This trick is old and worn out. The pattern is already formed; it all depends on when the big fish will turn hostile. The distribution of chips indicates that risk is about to be released. The thickness of the order book is interesting, but the RSI has already been above 80 for a long time. Overheated sentiment should really be a warning. A typical leek mentality, thinking that staring at the K-line can see through the market makers. Probabilistic strategies are not played that way. Spot wall-building combined with contract harvesting—I saw this three days ago. It's a bit slow to react now.

View OriginalReply0