Meta came under fire from Japanese regulators over fraudulent advertisements appearing on its platform. According to internal documents obtained by Reuters, the company responded by adjusting how content surfaced in its Ad Library—essentially making scam listings harder to discover during regulatory searches. The approach raised eyebrows: rather than removing the problematic ads outright, Meta appeared to employ a more subtle tactic, obscuring visibility of fraud-related content. Japan's concerns highlight a broader tension between platforms' enforcement efforts and their actual execution. For users and regulators alike, the revelation underscores challenges in maintaining transparency around cryptocurrency-related scams, which frequently exploit ad networks to reach unsuspecting investors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleSurfer
· 5h ago
This move is outrageous, it's like playing hide and seek. Is it so hard to remove the ads?
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 5h ago
Meta's approach is truly clever. Superficially cleaning up fraudulent ads, but in reality hiding the trash content in the dark, making it undetectable during regulatory searches—this is far less efficient than direct deletion.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 5h ago
This is Meta. The so-called rectification is actually just playing hide and seek—hiding scam ads so regulators can't find them. It's outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 6h ago
That's incredible. Meta's move this time is just "I didn't delete it, I just made it so you can't find it," a classic case of deceiving oneself to deceive others... The Japanese regulatory authorities have now found a handle to grasp.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 6h ago
Meta is playing tricks again; it's more like hide-and-seek than governance.
Meta came under fire from Japanese regulators over fraudulent advertisements appearing on its platform. According to internal documents obtained by Reuters, the company responded by adjusting how content surfaced in its Ad Library—essentially making scam listings harder to discover during regulatory searches. The approach raised eyebrows: rather than removing the problematic ads outright, Meta appeared to employ a more subtle tactic, obscuring visibility of fraud-related content. Japan's concerns highlight a broader tension between platforms' enforcement efforts and their actual execution. For users and regulators alike, the revelation underscores challenges in maintaining transparency around cryptocurrency-related scams, which frequently exploit ad networks to reach unsuspecting investors.