Bitcoin Core development faces a critical challenge that has nothing to do with coding skills. The real bottleneck? Code review. Pull requests keep piling up across the repository - currently sitting at over 300 open submissions. Some have been languishing for years, with at least one stuck in limbo for nearly a decade.
While developers flock to write new code, the unglamorous work of thorough code review gets overlooked. This creates a backlog that slows down the entire protocol's evolution. One simple solution could transform this: establish a funded review corps. Imagine having dedicated reviewers whose sole responsibility is rigorous testing and validation - essentially creating a testing-focused team that moves at the speed Bitcoin needs. These reviewers would become the gatekeepers of quality, ensuring that every PR gets proper scrutiny before merging.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BackrowObserver
· 7h ago
Ten years of PR still lying around, this is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 7h ago
Over 300 PRs piling up... This guy is right, code review is the real bottleneck, nobody wants to do this work.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 7h ago
Damn, over 300 PRs piled up? How long will it take to review all of these?
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHunter
· 7h ago
It's been ten years and it's still stuck, this is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
nft_widow
· 7h ago
300 PRs stacked up, some haven't been merged in ten years... this is truly the bottleneck.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 7h ago
300 PRs stacked... That's why BTC updates are as slow as a snail. We really need to hire a dedicated team of reviewers.
Bitcoin Core development faces a critical challenge that has nothing to do with coding skills. The real bottleneck? Code review. Pull requests keep piling up across the repository - currently sitting at over 300 open submissions. Some have been languishing for years, with at least one stuck in limbo for nearly a decade.
While developers flock to write new code, the unglamorous work of thorough code review gets overlooked. This creates a backlog that slows down the entire protocol's evolution. One simple solution could transform this: establish a funded review corps. Imagine having dedicated reviewers whose sole responsibility is rigorous testing and validation - essentially creating a testing-focused team that moves at the speed Bitcoin needs. These reviewers would become the gatekeepers of quality, ensuring that every PR gets proper scrutiny before merging.