OpenAI's leadership has been painting an optimistic picture about the company's path to profitability. As the organization scales, Sam Altman suggests that training costs for large models will become less of a financial burden relative to overall revenue—a classic economies of scale argument. The math sounds reasonable on paper. But there's a disconnect worth examining: despite these scaling projections, the company's actual losses have been climbing rather than shrinking. This gap between the theoretical model and real financials raises some tough questions about whether the current approach to AI development is truly sustainable, or if the economics need a fundamental reset.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeTokenGenius
· 9h ago
Sam is back to storytelling again. Armchair strategizing always sounds good, but the ledger won't lie.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 9h ago
Haha, it's the same old armchair strategizing, a show that gets slapped in the face by reality. Sam's story sounds good, but the losses are actually getting bigger? This logic is a bit hard to hold up.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 9h ago
Sam is telling stories again. The mathematics on paper is always perfect; what about reality? Losses are still increasing...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 9h ago
Economic models on paper clash with real financial data. Just listen to Sam's explanations; don't take them seriously.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 9h ago
ah, the classic disconnect between algorithmic projections and actual hash values in the ledger... altman's talking about economies of scale like it's some immutable blockchain primitive, but the real computational aesthetics here? the losses keep climbing lmao. it's giving "generative promises, non-generative results" energy ngl
Reply0
GetRichLeek
· 9h ago
Buddy Sam is telling us stories again. The numbers on paper look fine, but in reality, the losses are even bigger. Isn't this just like when I was trading cryptocurrencies? 😅
OpenAI's leadership has been painting an optimistic picture about the company's path to profitability. As the organization scales, Sam Altman suggests that training costs for large models will become less of a financial burden relative to overall revenue—a classic economies of scale argument. The math sounds reasonable on paper. But there's a disconnect worth examining: despite these scaling projections, the company's actual losses have been climbing rather than shrinking. This gap between the theoretical model and real financials raises some tough questions about whether the current approach to AI development is truly sustainable, or if the economics need a fundamental reset.