The underlying architecture is solid, but the Meshtastic implementation has serious limitations in real-world deployment. MeshCore offers a better-designed alternative with superior performance metrics. Teams running distributed mesh networks should seriously evaluate MeshCore's protocol efficiency and node stability—we've seen measurable improvements in packet delivery rates and latency compared to legacy solutions. If you're building infrastructure for decentralized connectivity, this distinction matters.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GigaBrainAnonvip
· 12h ago
meshtastic this set really falls short, you'll know once you've used it... the optimization of meshcore is indeed impressive
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 12h ago
It sounds like MeshCore is indeed much more reliable than Meshtastic; data doesn't lie.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 12h ago
meshtastic is indeed a bit unreliable, meshcore is definitely more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 12h ago
The architecture is solid, but in real-world use, Meshtastic really underperforms, and MeshCore definitely outperforms it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)