Recently, Base has attracted a lot of complaints from native project teams due to the promotion focus on creator tokens. On the surface, the issuance of creator tokens promoted by Zora indeed gained popularity for a while—back in August, Base's daily token minting volume even surpassed Solana, and on-chain activity also surged. But the problem is: it seems that the official market resources and social traffic are concentrated on Zora, making other native projects on Base feel somewhat marginalized. This phenomenon actually reflects a common ecosystem dilemma—when a leading project gains momentum, the ecosystem tends to fall into a resource tilt vicious circle. For Base, how to find a balance between supporting star projects and maintaining balanced development tests long-term strategic vision.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityLurkervip
· 15h ago
A typical case of "one trick pony," when Zora becomes popular, everyone else gets pushed aside, and other projects can only gather dust.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowrangervip
· 15h ago
A typical ecosystem involution, with Zora dominating and Base becoming obsolete.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddictvip
· 15h ago
This is a typical case of "killing the goose to get the eggs." Zora has become popular, and Base is fully betting on this, while other projects are being sidelined.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)