The developer fee structure seems broken. There's clearly an issue with how these fees are currently being handled in the protocol. Worth looking into whether this is affecting incentive alignment for the dev team or creating friction in the ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TopEscapeArtistvip
· 14h ago
The hidden danger of the fee structure should have been reviewed long ago. Historical experience tells me that misaligned incentives are a precursor to a head and shoulders top pattern.
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLowvip
· 14h ago
The fee structure should have been shaken up long ago; why is it still dragging on?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 14h ago
The fee structure has always been a longstanding issue in previous protocols, and the development team is probably already exhausted from it.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhangvip
· 14h ago
It's the fee issue again; this trick is really getting old.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathonervip
· 15h ago
ngl, fee mechanics been the silent killer in too many protocols. like mile 18 vibes where everybody's hitting the wall at once—devs lose alignment, ecosystem stutters. gotta dig into those numbers fr fr
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)