2025-12-30 23:22:58

Here's an interesting take on arbitrage bots flooding prediction markets lately. A trader managed to pull in 200k over 4 months using bot strategies, which sounds impressive until you realize the barrier to entry is basically zero. Once these arbitrage playbooks get shared, anyone with basic coding skills can deploy similar bots, completely saturating the market within days. This raises a real question: how sustainable are these returns when the strategy itself is copy-paste easy? The prediction market space might need to rethink whether these bot-driven strategies actually damage the PR and credibility of the entire ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryingOldWallet

· 01-02 06:03

200k sounds impressive, but it turns out to be just a copy-paste trick? This tactic will eventually backfire.

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 01-02 05:03

It's the same old bot pump-and-dump routine, 200k sounds intimidating but it's actually just a quick liquidation phase. --- The copy-paste strategy can really make money, it's unbelievable, really outrageous. --- Wait, are people still making money after this thing becomes saturated? Doubt it. --- Prediction markets were already chaotic, now with bots, they've become direct casinos. --- Basically, it's just information asymmetry benefits; once shared, it's gone. --- I just want to ask who is paying for the liquidity of these bots... --- Ecosystem credibility was gone long ago, and now you're only reflecting on it? --- Barrier to zero—that's the most disgusting part, there's absolutely no barrier.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 2025-12-31 05:32

Two million in four months looks tempting, but it's like the early digital art bubble... Once the secret gets leaked, the scarcity instantly collapses.

View OriginalReply0

ArbitrageBot

· 2025-12-30 23:53

200k in four months? Haha, wait until everyone tries the bot, and it instantly becomes a zero-sum game.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlertBot

· 2025-12-30 23:50

200k sounds good, but how many can truly survive beyond the copy-paste stage?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeePhobia

· 2025-12-30 23:30

Alright, alright, it's the same old crypto circle story. Listening to 200k in 4 months sounds great, but in reality? This kind of thing is doomed the moment it's shared.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 2025-12-30 23:25

200k sounds sexy until you realize it's just a copy-paste trick... Truly ridiculous --- The issue of bot proliferation should have been addressed long ago. Now everything can be automated, and the ecosystem should be collapsing too --- So basically, it's a low-threshold strategy to exploit users. After saturation, who will take over the losses? --- This round of prediction markets must create some differentiated competition, or they'll be dead end --- Relying on bots to make money? Uh... I'll think about it some more --- 200k in four months sounds good, but according to his logic, it would be everywhere in a few days. Who would still believe that? --- The credibility has already been compromised long ago. Now you want to fix it? It's a bit late, everyone

View OriginalReply0