Many projects on the BSC chain employ manipulative tactics. Those interested can trace the transaction paths of high-yield addresses themselves. The key is to look at the correlation between newly created wallet addresses and the project team, then layer by layer infer—check the fund flow chain, compare with exchange deposit records, and you can basically understand the scheme. Common features of such projects include data manipulation and liquidity fake-boosting. Once losses occur, on-chain data tracing often reveals key evidence, especially when tracking large deposit and withdrawal records, which is crucial for subsequent rights protection. This obvious fraudulent tactic is really frustrating—project teams use false publicity and data manipulation to drain retail investors. Recognizing these signals early can help avoid falling into traps.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWatcher
· 01-01 13:03
been there, lost that... bsc scams hitting different these days. those liquidity pools? 99% fake af. follow the wallet trails, check exchange deposit records... that's where the bodies are buried ngl. seen this movie before in 2022, margin calls don't lie. protect your position, seriously.
Reply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-01 03:18
Another wave of exposing BSC scandals, wake up everyone
---
Ugh, it's the same old trick again, fake liquidity, wallet tracking... I'm already tired of it
---
Damn, this is the real on-chain detective, more professional than the FBI
---
The problem is most people can't track on their own at all, and in the end, they still learn the hard way
---
Honestly, what are those who see through these tricks doing now? Reverse operation?
---
Data traceability should have been popularized long ago to prevent many from getting caught
---
Is there a way to protect your rights? Ha, in this circle, it's basically a pipe dream
---
This is true due diligence, most people are still reading whitepapers
---
That's right, but so what if you can identify it? You still have to admit defeat
---
On-chain data transparency is good, the cost of misconduct rises sharply
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 01-01 02:36
It's the same old trick again, there are really many scammers on BSC
Hey, really, some project data just looks suspicious
Fake liquidity is an old trick, and people still fall for it?
That's right, it can all be checked on-chain, it just depends on whether someone takes the time to investigate
Retail investors need to be more cautious; these tricks are actually just paper tigers
Protecting rights is a later issue; it's more realistic to avoid getting chopped up by the market.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 2025-12-31 21:43
It's the same old trick again. I'm already tired of it. Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 2025-12-30 21:00
This tactic is too poorly executed on BSC. You can identify it just by looking at the address transfer paths. It's really not interesting.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 2025-12-30 20:58
Another one talking about traceability, but to be honest, this trick is really terrible. Do those project teams really think retail investors are fools?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 2025-12-30 20:53
Smile and lose this one, then look at the financial statements to find the culprit
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 2025-12-30 20:45
It's the same old trick again. Honestly, I'm tired of it, and people are still jumping in.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeacher
· 2025-12-30 20:45
Here's another article teaching people how to track on-chain scandals. Honestly, I'm already tired of this routine.
---
Fake liquidity is so outrageous. Does anyone still fall for it?
---
Tracing the source is one thing, but retail investors don't have the time to analyze transaction paths, they're just armchair strategists after the fact.
---
Sounds good, but what’s the point if you discover it? Rights protection is basically a dream.
---
On BSC, there are plenty of scam projects; it's been a high-risk zone for a long time.
---
Those who can identify these signals early have already avoided them. Do they still need reminders?
---
Data falsification and false advertising are just industry norms.
---
Instead of studying how others scam, it's better to learn how not to be scammed.
---
I've tried the method of checking deposit records, but exchange rate limits are also an issue.
---
Articles like this come out every week, and project teams still open new accounts to continue scamming investors.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 2025-12-30 20:41
It's the same old trick, I'm already tired of it. On-chain evidence is right there, a dedicated person could uncover it in a few days. The problem is that retail investors simply don't have the patience or the tools...
Many projects on the BSC chain employ manipulative tactics. Those interested can trace the transaction paths of high-yield addresses themselves. The key is to look at the correlation between newly created wallet addresses and the project team, then layer by layer infer—check the fund flow chain, compare with exchange deposit records, and you can basically understand the scheme. Common features of such projects include data manipulation and liquidity fake-boosting. Once losses occur, on-chain data tracing often reveals key evidence, especially when tracking large deposit and withdrawal records, which is crucial for subsequent rights protection. This obvious fraudulent tactic is really frustrating—project teams use false publicity and data manipulation to drain retail investors. Recognizing these signals early can help avoid falling into traps.