How did Kaito Launchpad perform in 2025? Data show

Question

CryptoWageSlave · Accepted Answer

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't experience a price drop; this success rate is truly heartbreaking.

The wave of price drops is coming; it still depends on luck and timing.

LMTS stands out alone, while others are swimming in blood.

Launchpad gambling attributes are becoming stronger; choosing wrong means heavy losses.

Three haven't even had TGE yet; they might also end up being casualties.

Instead of chasing new projects, it's better to focus on those that have already proven themselves; the risks are too high.

PLAID had a crash on the first day; this is a textbook example of a negative case.

11 projects experienced a price drop; the ratio is a bit terrifying. Newbies, wake up.

ZKP can stay stable, which is good, but this is just a minority.

MissedAirdropBro · Answer

It's another major dip event, LMTS really held the scene... forget about the others.

BtcDailyResearcher · Answer

Only 3 out of 14 projects have stabilized, this break-even rate is really quite brutal.

PLAI crashed on its first day, lessons must be learned.

Wait, what about those 3 projects that haven't had TGE yet? Their future seems to be the real key.

How do the veterans choose? Can they really make a profit?

LMTS has held up pretty well, but overall, it's truly a game of life and death.

Break-even becoming the norm, this is the real picture of current launchpads.

14 projects a year, and only a few survive in the end. These numbers need to wake us up.

GateUser-9ad11037 · Answer

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't break the IPO price... This success rate is really disappointing; it still depends on luck and timing.

MEVHunterWang · Answer

Only 3 out of 14 projects are still standing; this collapse rate is truly astonishing.

ForkTongue · Answer

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't break the launch price; this data is pretty brutal... Launchpad is still a gamble

Honestly, relying on luck rather than skill is best avoided

LMTS is indeed impressive this time, but as for the others... sigh

Another bloody lesson; choosing the wrong project really turns into a slaughterhouse

Rather than trusting Launchpad, it's better to do your own research and pick projects

With such a high break rate, who still dares to go all in

Brothers, don't be fooled by hype; the risks are written all over it

UncleWhale · Answer

Out of 14 projects, only 3 haven't experienced a breakdown, and we have to wait for three TGEs to know... The success rate is truly incredible.

With such aggressive breakdowns, the LMTS team really made a profit, while the others are all lessons learned.

PLAI performed poorly on its first day; I don't touch such projects. If the timing is just a little off, it's all over.

I predicted that XNL would be the weakest; choosing projects really depends on luck.

By the way, can these three projects that haven't had their TGE save the day, or will it continue to be stories of bagholders?

TokenAlchemist · Answer

ngl the 21% survival rate screaming inefficiency vectors here... most launchpads are just liquidity traps masquerading as alpha opportunities honestly

ColdWalletGuardian · Answer

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't experience a dip below the launch price. That's crazy. It's better to stay away from launchpads.

How did Kaito Launchpad perform in 2025? Data shows that a total of 14 new projects were launched last year. Among them, 3 projects have not yet undergone TGE, namely Espresso, Billions, and Rise.

Trending Topics

Bitcoin2026PriceOutlook

CryptoMarketRebound

My2026FirstPost

TrumpLaunchesStrikesonVenezuela

GateNewTokenWatch

Hot Gate Fun

2026新年

2026新年

Caterpillar

Caterpillar

HOPPY

HOPPY

shi

ce

2026

2026

Pin