The recent market has been fluctuating back and forth, but the amplitude of this wave is clearly expanding. BTC is oscillating between 86,800 and 90,000, while ETH is fluctuating in the 2900 to 3000 range.
Last night's trading record: I entered a long position on ETH at 2925, and also bought some bottoms at BTC 87100. I initially wanted to chase on-chain, but the market didn't give me the opportunity, so I switched to contract order placement. The holding profit rate in a certain wallet has already reached 33%, which is a pretty good feedback.
Recently, many people have been asking me whether to follow up on LIT. Honestly, I probably won't take it. From past experience, projects that truly want to pump usually don't operate this way. I'm sharing this idea with everyone; if it's of any reference value, you can think it over yourself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NeonCollector
· 01-01 20:55
2925 Bottoming ETH? Sis, your move is pretty bold.
This wave is definitely expanding, feels like it could explode at any moment.
That LIT thing really should be avoided; it's obviously a scam.
Jealous of the 33% return, I'm still at a loss.
Learning this trick of placing contract orders is much more stable than chasing after orders.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-01 04:25
A 33% return rate is indeed impressive, but it seems your logic for judging LIT is even more valuable.
---
An increase in volatility is actually a signal; ROI is the true standard for testing everything.
---
Based on your position data, the computational power gains from this round of operations should not be low.
---
I agree with your view on LIT; the pump-and-dump tactics have long been exposed.
---
Buying ETH at 2925 and bottoming out BTC at 87100—there's something about this timing.
---
Using contract orders is indeed more reliable than chasing on-chain, avoiding the risk of being front-run.
---
The 33% figure shows that your sense for opportunity is still sharp.
---
Real projects don't need such effort to pump the price; you're right about that.
---
From a technical iteration perspective, the BTC range is indeed worth positioning.
---
What's interesting is how you determine which projects truly want to be pumped; this experience probably comes from having suffered some losses.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerker
· 2025-12-31 00:29
The sideways market continues, with the repetitive cycle of getting chopped up, but luckily I haven't gone all in.
LIT is indeed a bit risky; the project's tactics are easily seen through.
Bought the dip at 2925 ETH, pretty clever approach.
A 33% return rate, quite steady, much better than me.
Contract orders are just waiting; sometimes waiting pays more than chasing.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 2025-12-30 18:10
A 33% return is pretty good, but I think your bottom-fishing courage is a bit bold this time.
LIT does have some issues, I haven't touched it either.
The volatility has indeed increased this time; you should think carefully before entering.
Contract trading still requires caution, brother.
Did you make a profit on the long position at 2925?
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 2025-12-30 06:55
Good operation records, but don't let too many people know about the 33% profit, it's easy to get cut.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 2025-12-30 06:40
The market is still able to achieve a 33% return despite such volatility, there's something there.
The LIT project does seem a bit off, feels like there's a deeper scheme.
2925 to buy the dip on ETH? Not to mention, this level is likely to go lower.
The contract order placement method is reliable, but it's exhausting.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 2025-12-30 06:36
A 33% return is indeed good, but I feel like the LIT scheme is a bit familiar. Projects that have been cut before are all pretty much the same.
---
I also saw the ETH long position copied at 2925; they really have guts.
---
When volatility widens, it's easiest to get trapped. I choose to wait and see for a while.
---
You can't track on-chain movements in real-time, but I get the idea of placing orders on the futures market.
---
That LIT project feels like fishing; if they really wanted to pump, they would have acted earlier.
---
A 33% profit is quite solid in this market, but I don't know when it will be pulled back.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 2025-12-30 06:30
With such a large fluctuation, you need to watch the market more closely; it's not something casual people can play with.
If the market doesn't give opportunities, just place orders; it's all the same anyway.
That thing with LIT... the套路 is a bit deep, I also pass.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 2025-12-30 06:29
2925 Long position? Bro, your guts are pretty bold. I'm still waiting for a breakdown here.
A 33% return rate, no hype, no negativity. It really works, but the mindset can easily explode.
That thing called LIT, with such ambiguous pump methods, I really dare not touch it. Reliable projects would have already been pumped.
BTC's fluctuation range is getting bigger and bigger. Feels like a breakout is just around the corner, right?
Contract orders are much more reliable than chasing orders. Peace of mind.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhale
· 2025-12-30 06:29
Buying the dip on ETH at 2925, not a bad move. Just worried that by the time it rallies, you've already sold.
The recent market has been fluctuating back and forth, but the amplitude of this wave is clearly expanding. BTC is oscillating between 86,800 and 90,000, while ETH is fluctuating in the 2900 to 3000 range.
Last night's trading record: I entered a long position on ETH at 2925, and also bought some bottoms at BTC 87100. I initially wanted to chase on-chain, but the market didn't give me the opportunity, so I switched to contract order placement. The holding profit rate in a certain wallet has already reached 33%, which is a pretty good feedback.
Recently, many people have been asking me whether to follow up on LIT. Honestly, I probably won't take it. From past experience, projects that truly want to pump usually don't operate this way. I'm sharing this idea with everyone; if it's of any reference value, you can think it over yourself.