Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Assessing the true profitability of a crypto project hinges on understanding one key figure: net contribution revenue.
How to calculate it? It's actually simple—revenue captured by the treasury minus all costs. These costs include infrastructure, security audits, legal compliance, employee salaries, contractor fees, and various operational expenses.
But there's a common pitfall here: high trading volume, high TVL (Total Value Locked), and market buzz—these flashy numbers don't necessarily equate to income. Unless the protocol itself can truly retain fees, these metrics are just vanity indicators.
There's also a frequently overlooked real cost—token incentives and various subsidies. Don't treat these as free "growth hacking" perks; they are tangible economic costs that directly erode net contribution.
So next time you evaluate a project, peel back the surface prosperity and work backwards from this perspective to see whether the project is genuinely profitable or just burning cash.
Token incentives are the most deceptive part; it looks like growth but is actually just giving away money. It should have been included in the cost calculation long ago.
Net contribution income, to put it simply, is about peeling away all the fancy layers to see if the project’s pocket truly contains real cash.
High TVL doesn’t necessarily mean profitability, I’ve known that for a long time... Many projects are just relying on subsidies to bluff their way through.
Token incentives are like free lunches; in the end, someone has to foot the bill.
To put it simply, it's about whether they can truly become self-sustaining. Don't be fooled by vanity metrics.
This is the correct way to evaluate a project. Unfortunately, 99% of people are still fixated on leaderboard rankings.
Basically, it's just about doing the math, but unfortunately 99% of project teams are reluctant to reveal the true costs.
The token incentives part is really ridiculous, burning money while calling it "ecosystem growth," hilarious.
How many projects can truly make money? Most are just burning investors' money.
The token incentives part is the funniest; dressing subsidies up as growth hacking. Wake up, everyone.
Those who only look at surface data should be cut once.
If the protocol can't retain fees, it's just an empty shell. Simple and straightforward, but effective.
TVL is just a big joke; I’ve seen so many projects die right here.
The part about token incentives is correct; too many people think burning money equals growth. Wake up, everyone.