Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Boaz Weinstein's Saba hedge fund is ramping up pressure on investors holding the London-listed fund managed by Baillie Gifford. The move centers on a push to remove certain board members before a crucial January shareholder vote. This escalation signals intensifying tensions over fund governance and strategic direction. Saba's aggressive stance suggests dissatisfaction with current board composition and operational decisions. With the vote looming, shareholders now face mounting pressure to side with either incumbent management or support the activist push for change. The outcome could reshape the fund's future trajectory and investment philosophy.
---
Wait, is Boaz Weinstein really going to move on the board? Will January's vote directly overturn the situation?
---
Honestly, such aggressive activities can sometimes bring about change, but Baillie Gifford is not to be underestimated.
---
It's another power struggle; investors are just sitting back and watching the show.
---
Interesting, will this succeed? It seems Saba's chances are not that great.
---
The impact of Weinstein's tactics on us retail investors is really limited; it's better to focus on our own positions.
---
Internal fund conflicts are escalating; these things happen all the time, and in the end, shareholders pay the price.
Baillie Gifford's board is about to be criticized, it seems January's vote needs to be carefully considered
Retail investors are forced to pick sides again, this governance game is so annoying
I'm already tired of Boaz's tricks, who is the next target
Will the fund manager be pushed out? Investors are getting anxious
The old tricks of dividing shares, same old soup, different bowl
Before the January vote, the pressure is at its peak, shareholders must choose sides
Can Baillie Gifford withstand this time... uncertain
Aggressive versus conservative, who should we bet on
That's why I don't touch funds, too many tricks involved
Can a single vote change the fate of a fund? Truly impressive
Saba is causing trouble again, let’s see how far this can go
Holders need to be more cautious this time
Boardroom chaos, investors caught in the crossfire
Master of disruption Weinstein, the tactics are getting more elaborate
Another power game, does this voting really mean anything?
Governance issues are so complex, no wonder fund returns are disappointing
---
Baillie Gifford's board must be panicking; the real showdown is in January.
---
Activist investors always follow this pattern, but will it work this time...
---
It's already 2024, and they're still fighting governance battles in London. Isn't that a bit outdated?
---
Conflicts of interest. I'm optimistic about Saba this time. The management team is indeed a bit rigid right now.
---
Voting in January, betting that Boaz will win. This guy has never lost.
---
Baillie Gifford's LPs must be getting restless. This kind of public confrontation isn't a good sign.
---
On the eve of the January vote, the battle for governance rights is intensifying, let's see who can take the helm.
---
Saba's aggressive approach is nothing new in Web3; the power struggles in some DAOs are really nothing special.
---
It's another internal fight in traditional finance. Although our crypto world is chaotic, at least the rules are written on the chain.
---
Honestly, I'm a bit tired of this kind of boardroom tearing... The outcome is still the same group of people changing positions to continue the cut.
---
What is Baillie Gifford thinking? Such a large fund being forced into a corner by aggressive hedge funds.
---
Shareholders are about to pick sides, but the problem is neither side is very trustworthy.
---
Aggressive investors vs traditional fund managers, the real showdown in January. Who will win?
---
Baillie Gifford is probably going to be pushed to the limit this time; a public opinion battle has started.
---
Another drama of aggressive hedge funds versus veteran fund managers, investors become pawns.
---
Can the January vote really change anything? Or is it just another old game of capital?
---
Wait, what new direction is Saba pushing? Just to replace a few directors?
---
The power game in the capital markets never ends; who will be kicked out this time?
---
I can't understand the twists and turns of these fund managers, but aggressive capital always creates hot topics.
---
January might be a watershed moment; shareholders need to make a decision.
Saba's tactics are truly fierce. The voting in January should be quite a show.
Traditional funds are rigid; someone needs to stir things up.