Regarding tokenization, I haven't decided yet, but if I have to take this route, you guys jump ahead and directly start the tokenize operation—honestly, this logic is a bit absurd.
I'm impressed; charging a 3.5k fee just based on technical packaging is a bit intense. Although I like this fighting spirit, sometimes seeing these things does get a bit tiring.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotFinancialAdvice
· 01-01 18:26
5% and then run, still smart people. Tokenize is indeed outrageous.
A 3.5k fee like this, I really can't take it anymore.
Striving is striving, but this kind of wool-harvesting is truly pointless.
It's called innovation in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's just like this.
Still need to observe and watch out, don't get caught up in this trick.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 01-01 17:39
Running away at 5%, this player is quite cautious... But I’m also clueless about the tokenize approach; it feels like the tricks are getting deeper and deeper.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 2025-12-31 11:03
5% just run, I need to learn this speed. But tokenize this set of things really can't hold up, there's still a bit of gambling flavor.
---
3.5k in fees just like that goes into the pocket? The business of technical packaging is really ruthless, but in the long run, there will always be a day when it collapses.
---
By the way, why rush to charge ahead of others? I somewhat understand this mentality, but frankly, it's all about gambling on probabilities.
---
Leave at 5%, this person knows how to withdraw completely. Unlike some people who have to go all-in waiting for a surge, only to get trapped and die.
---
As for the fees, it's really a printing press for the technical side. But thinking about it, it makes sense, after all, who bears the risk?
---
Before I even figured out tokenize, someone already started, this is the cruelty of the track. A slow step might get eliminated.
---
I understand the sense of striving, but if you ask me, sometimes you just need to face reality. Not all opportunities are worth chasing.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 2025-12-29 18:58
Running at just 5%, how can you be so decisive?
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 2025-12-29 18:53
5% and you ran? Haha, I really give up.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 2025-12-29 18:51
5% returns directly run, a smart person's move. This tokenization tactic is indeed hard to describe.
---
3.5k in fees can be easily cut through packaging, these guys really have some ideas.
---
Why does it feel like everyone is rushing to follow the trend, making it seem like copy-pasting, it's boring.
---
Honestly, this round of operations is a bit outrageous, the wait-and-see crowd is winning big.
---
One word, tiring. I'm tired of these flashy things.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 2025-12-29 18:49
Running at just 5%, really a bit cautious, huh?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 2025-12-29 18:46
Running away at 5%, I understand this mindset, but tokenizing this thing is indeed a bit of a rush.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 2025-12-29 18:43
Run at 5%, I give this mentality a full score. Selling early brings peace of mind.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 2025-12-29 18:31
Run at just 5%, pretty confident attitude, but I will fight to the end.
I sold the 5% profit on the spot.
Regarding tokenization, I haven't decided yet, but if I have to take this route, you guys jump ahead and directly start the tokenize operation—honestly, this logic is a bit absurd.
I'm impressed; charging a 3.5k fee just based on technical packaging is a bit intense. Although I like this fighting spirit, sometimes seeing these things does get a bit tiring.