Recently, the US market hours have been frequently declining, and the underlying logic is worth noting. After the Asian session's rally, market participants began to gamble—fearing that US traders waking up would sell off, they chose to act early. This phenomenon essentially reflects that liquidity remains tight. When market participants are PVPing each other, it often indicates that large funds have not yet truly entered the market, and market depth is insufficient. From a trading perspective, the strategy at this stage is very clear: short on rallies. As long as the liquidity problem is not fundamentally improved, rebounds are opportunities to short. The market is waiting for genuine incremental capital injection to change this situation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-01 10:41
Those who jumped the gun all got trapped, really cowardly
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGriller
· 2025-12-31 14:19
Ha, it's the same old liquidity crunch trick, with retail investors PVPing each other, just a prelude to cutting the leeks.
Waiting for big funds? Brother, you'll be waiting till the end of time; this cycle is a dead loop.
Shorting on rallies is fine, but the only concern is you reacting too slowly and getting trapped.
The US market crashes, the Asian market pulls up, basically it's funds acting out a show, while retail investors are just spectators.
If liquidity doesn't improve, even a beautiful rebound is just a paper tiger; I still remain bearish.
This wave of market movement is truly boring, lacking real capital injection, all technical internal competition.
If market depth isn't enough, so be it; you should still act when needed, but recognize that this isn't a trend, it's just cutting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 2025-12-29 17:41
ah here we go again... *checks charts from 2018* the preemptive dump before the US wake-up call. literally the same playbook, different cycle. liquidity drying up = everyone knifefighting in an empty pool lmao
Reply0
GovernancePretender
· 2025-12-29 14:00
Liquidity is this tight, it's about time to take action.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 2025-12-29 13:55
With such poor liquidity, a rebound should be smashed. You're absolutely right.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 2025-12-29 13:54
Still daring to take over despite such poor liquidity, truly a brave warrior
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 2025-12-29 13:44
With such poor liquidity, there are still people willing to take over. I really can't hold on anymore.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 2025-12-29 13:39
Going short at the high is not wrong, but can we really wait for incremental funds this time, or will we continue to PVP each other until the end of time?
Recently, the US market hours have been frequently declining, and the underlying logic is worth noting. After the Asian session's rally, market participants began to gamble—fearing that US traders waking up would sell off, they chose to act early. This phenomenon essentially reflects that liquidity remains tight. When market participants are PVPing each other, it often indicates that large funds have not yet truly entered the market, and market depth is insufficient. From a trading perspective, the strategy at this stage is very clear: short on rallies. As long as the liquidity problem is not fundamentally improved, rebounds are opportunities to short. The market is waiting for genuine incremental capital injection to change this situation.