A $110M fraud case has sparked fresh conversations about financial transparency and where public funds actually go. The frustration is real—people work hard, pay taxes, yet have no clear visibility into government spending. It raises a fundamental question about power dynamics: public servants should ultimately answer to citizens, not the other way around. The demand for systemic change isn't just complaint; it's accountability in action.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoneyBurner
· 2025-12-31 14:50
Over 100 million USD scammed? Bro, you gotta dig into this on-chain data. Basically, it's just that the power isn't locked on the chain.
Arbitrage opportunities! Every time there's a collapse, you can see who's shorting the asset. I've already built my position.
Stop talking about transparency. The Web2 model should have gone bankrupt long ago. It's better to go fully decentralized on-chain.
That's why I’m all in on on-chain assets. At least the smart contract code is right here, so there's no behind-the-scenes manipulation.
Sounds good, but it's just a reallocation of power. What we small retail investors should care about is which coin is about to take off.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 2025-12-29 05:56
Over a hundred million dollars lost, and we taxpayers can't even see the exact amount. This situation really can't be sustained anymore.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 2025-12-29 05:55
lol $110M is cute, actually if you read the contract behind most gov spending you'd find the real numbers make this look like pocket change. but yeah people finally waking up to the vesting schedule of public theft, call it what it is
Reply0
MEVEye
· 2025-12-29 05:38
This 110M hole really can't hold up anymore, really... Every time they say they'll be transparent, but in the end, it's the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGod
· 2025-12-29 05:37
1. Over a hundred million dollars just gone like that, who will take responsibility...
2. The taxes have been paid, but where the money really went is truly invisible
3. This is outrageous, public servants owe us an explanation
4. Why should we be kept in the dark? The promised transparency...
5. The problem isn't in shouting, no one is actually listening
6. The elected officials instead turn their backs on voters, it's reversed
7. Another big black hole, I'm speechless
8. Fine, let's continue with the taxes, anyway they can't be thoroughly investigated
9. This is the real problem, the system itself needs to be changed
10. How the money is spent should be made clear, isn't that reasonable
A $110M fraud case has sparked fresh conversations about financial transparency and where public funds actually go. The frustration is real—people work hard, pay taxes, yet have no clear visibility into government spending. It raises a fundamental question about power dynamics: public servants should ultimately answer to citizens, not the other way around. The demand for systemic change isn't just complaint; it's accountability in action.