2025-12-28 23:25:16

Here's the thing—a challenge shouldn't work this way. There's a token with a fresh AMM sitting at 400k liquidity and pulling over 2M in trading volume. But then you announce a specific date for when you'll reveal the winning project? That doesn't add up. You can't set expectations like that and simultaneously be selecting winners. It breaks the whole premise of a fair challenge.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

JustHodlIt

· 2025-12-31 21:30

Your operation does have some issues... scheduling the date in advance and then choosing the winner, who would believe this is a fair competition?

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 2025-12-28 23:54

This is obviously playing word games. First set the date, then choose the winner. Anyone can see the trick.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 2025-12-28 23:47

the liquidity-to-volume ratio screaming red flags here... 400k TVL channeling 2M volume is basically the philosopher's stone working backwards. announcing a reveal date before the transmutation settles? that's not alchemy, that's just predetermined manipulation dressed up as fairness tbh

Reply0

VirtualRichDream

· 2025-12-28 23:44

The preview tournament format is really quite disappointing. How can they set the date and choose the winner at the same time?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 2025-12-28 23:27

ngl this reeks of the same setup that got me liquidated in '22... announcing dates before winners? that's how you get front-running chaos. health factor's gonna tank before anyone knows what hit 'em

Reply0