2025-12-26 01:21:01

As 2026 approaches, some key technological projects are beginning to show clear directions. Take the large-scale plan like the "Galactic Encyclopedia" as an example; it has gone beyond mere technological breakthroughs and now represents a way of inheriting human civilization.

Interestingly, more and more voices are starting to think about these issues in Chinese. When traffic gradually shifts back, emotions resonate within the community, and the self-propagating ecosystem forms a closed loop, you will notice an interesting phenomenon: the direction of the era has actually been decided long ago.

I won't arbitrarily say who will definitely become the answer. But it is undeniable that some participants and some communities are already ahead in their actions and ideas. They are not just observing changes but actively participating in shaping them. This initiative is now distinguishing different development trajectories.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoMotivator

· 2025-12-28 23:57

Galactic Encyclopedia? Sounds grand, but honestly, the outcome of such large-scale plans still depends on the community ecosystem and whether it's truly genuine. Wait, are you saying the direction was decided long ago? Are we those who are messing around inside riding the wind or against the wind? I'm just worried it's another round of fresh narratives. --- Proactively shaping change sounds good, but I just want to ask who is really doing this, and who is just standing on the sidelines commenting. --- Thinking in Chinese definitely has its advantages, but when the wind shifts, who can say for sure? --- Flow back, ecological closed-loop... I've heard these words for three years. When will we finally see real cash rewards? --- No, are you saying that the early movers have already won? Do latecomers still have a chance? --- It's that same participation and shaping narrative again, feeling like endorsing certain project teams, but who has really changed anything?

View OriginalReply0

OPsychology

· 2025-12-27 16:45

Hey, wait a minute, does the Galaxy Encyclopedia really have the ability to pass down civilization? It still feels a bit far-fetched. By the way, are the people who are truly leading the way already on board? I believe in the closed-loop of the Chinese community, but can the advantage of being a latecomer really turn the tide? Choosing a direction is a bit mystical, haha. Hold on, who said the direction of the era was already decided? I haven't heard about that. Being proactive definitely makes a difference, but making money is the real key, right? What is this article talking about? It feels a bit vague. But participating in shaping it is definitely more exciting than just watching. By the way, what are you guys doing now?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 2025-12-26 23:56

It's been obvious for a while; the Chinese community has indeed been leading the way. Those who don't follow the trend are the real winners.

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 2025-12-26 01:51

By the way, this set of arguments sounds a bit familiar... Let's verify the data. Who exactly is the one who "already chose the direction"?

View OriginalReply0

CodeZeroBasis

· 2025-12-26 01:50

The Galaxy Encyclopedia set, to put it simply, is about redefining the discourse power... It feels like the Chinese community is indeed doing something different this time. Honestly, this scene doesn't seem like just following the trend; it looks more like someone is really playing chess. Is the direction already chosen? Then I’m even more curious about who is truly leading and who is just following. This sense of an ecological closed loop... to be honest, it's a bit scary, but also quite期待. Rather than a technological breakthrough, is it more about a redistribution of power?

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 2025-12-26 01:46

Traffic backflow, ecosystem closed-loop... It sounds grand, but frankly, it's all about who can grasp the narrative right. Someone has been doing this for a while, they just haven't been noticed. The difference between genuine participants and onlookers is immediately recognizable.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTears

· 2025-12-26 01:37

The direction chosen by the era... Wait, doesn't that mean whoever acts first wins? It feels a bit vague. Honestly, the Chinese community's return is indeed happening; it all depends on who can truly stabilize the ecological closed loop. The Galaxy Encyclopedia sounds quite grand, but what progress has been made specifically? Community resonance seems simple, but truly maintaining the rhythm is challenging. Not everyone who "leads the way" makes it to the end; how many times has history taught us that? Proactive shaping vs. passive observation, the difference is indeed significant, but it depends on who has enough resources. If this round can truly succeed in closing the loop, it will be different... worth paying attention to. I can see the actions of participants, but I don't know how long they can坚持.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 2025-12-26 01:35

Speaking of this "Galactic Encyclopedia," it sounds quite grand, but it still depends on who can truly push it to implementation. The awakening of the Chinese community has indeed changed, but after the traffic backflow... will it become a new information cocoon? Are the people leading the way truly shaping the future or just making loud noises? This question mark needs to be placed. This wave of trendsetting was chosen early, but those who choose early often also crash quickly; history has shown this many times. The ecological closed-loop sounds great but can easily lead to self-censorship, and interesting things might get drowned out. Not all proactive participation is the right direction; sometimes, being a bit slower can help you survive longer.

View OriginalReply0