Looking at the $CRCL case, I am even more certain why I have no interest in this type of IPO project. Such opportunities are better left to those who enjoy short-term trading and high-risk gambling; I'm not really into this approach.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
mev_me_maybe
· 2025-12-27 12:12
The world belongs to short-term snipers, but I still stick to my long-term narrative.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 2025-12-26 01:27
IPO stocks are really easy to get cut, I've seen through it long ago. It's better to invest in projects with solid fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 2025-12-26 00:57
Haha, IPO is such an old trick, truly a gambler's paradise.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 2025-12-26 00:54
This kind of IPO approach really isn't suitable for me; it's too easy to get caught as a rookie.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTrauma
· 2025-12-26 00:48
This IPO tactic of cutting leeks is outdated; holding coins steadily is more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 2025-12-26 00:31
I've long seen through it; the IPO game has too high a threshold and outrageous risks, not worth it.
Looking at the $CRCL case, I am even more certain why I have no interest in this type of IPO project. Such opportunities are better left to those who enjoy short-term trading and high-risk gambling; I'm not really into this approach.