2025-12-25 23:23:31

Recently, I have been paying attention to the development direction of the RWA track, and I want to say—simply putting US stock assets on the blockchain is not fundamentally the same as a true RWA application. This distinction is worth deep consideration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FancyResearchLab

· 17h ago

In theory, it should be feasible, but in practice, you're locking yourself into the contract. Putting assets on the chain ≠ solving real-world pain points. I'll try this pitfall first.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 12-27 11:44

Basically, it's just blockchain in disguise, still the same centralized logic.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 12-26 17:25

That's right, listing US stocks on the blockchain is just a shell; the key is whether it can solve the liquidity and compliance issues of real assets.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 12-25 23:53

That's correct, it's just a shell game. True RWA should be a revolution in asset liquidity. Currently, most projects are just hyping concepts.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessApe

· 12-25 23:48

Exactly right. Now, a bunch of projects are just simple packaging, creating a tokenized shell and daring to call it RWA. It's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer