2025-12-25 23:22:29

Sei is currently at a critical juncture. The price has been bouncing at the bottom, but this is not a sign of decline—more like a skilled warrior shedding heavy armor, lightening the load for the upcoming decisive battle.

This public chain has always touted itself as revolutionizing trading experience through "order book optimization" and ultra-fast performance. Its dual-architecture compatibility with both EVM and CosmWasm was once considered an advantage, aimed at maximizing developer attraction. But in reality, this dual-track system has brought about increased complexity in development environments, higher operational costs, and a fragmented user experience.

The turning point has arrived. The community is pushing forward with the SIP-3 proposal, which represents a thorough strategic adjustment—abandoning the dual-architecture and fully embracing "EVM Only."

**Why "subtract" instead of "add"?** Focus is key to delivering powerful punches. Rather than maintaining two ecosystems, all development resources, tools, and documentation should be concentrated into the vast Ethereum ecosystem. According to testnet feedback, performance and development efficiency in a pure EVM environment have achieved a qualitative leap.

What's even more interesting is the contrast between on-chain data and price. On one side, transaction volume and on-chain activity are exploding; on the other side, the token price is still hovering at low levels. This divergence often signals an inevitable revaluation of value. When the market finally reacts, the outcome could be quite fascinating.

SEI-2,54%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-74b10196

· 2025-12-28 23:22

I like the strategy of doing subtraction. Focusing on EVM means recognizing yourself clearly; don't try to have everything.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizeMe

· 2025-12-28 23:06

Wow, this move looks pretty aggressive, abandoning the dual-track system to focus on EVM, I'm just worried the community won't be able to react in time. On-chain data is exploding but the token price remains stagnant, which is a bit frustrating, but this kind of situation is actually the most interesting. If SIP-3 really gets pushed through, how will they handle the developers working on CosmWasm later? Will there be any protests? Repeated lows might not necessarily be a bad thing, maybe it's just accumulation, and by the time they realize it, it might be too late. I've heard this logic many times before, but ultimately it comes down to execution. Many chains say they want to cut back, but none of them stick with it in the end. I believe in performance improvements, but whether the ecosystem can keep up is the key. Having technology without users is just self-indulgence. When prices are low, it's actually a good time to see a project's true strength. If Sei really has something, then just wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

TradingNightmare

· 2025-12-25 23:50

Switching to EVM Only for the dual-track system, in other words, admitting that the previous path was wrong. But this move is quite genuine—despite the data showing gains, the coin price is still stagnant. Isn't this just waiting for the market reaction?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerPrivateKey

· 2025-12-25 23:49

Ha, the dual-track system was always a false proposition. It's too late to realize that now. Whether EVM-only can truly catch up with Sol is the real key. The data looks good, but if the price doesn't move, there's no confidence. Wait, is this really an opportunity to buy at the bottom, or is it just another round of the leek's routine? Doing subtraction is the right approach, but Sei's brand strength is indeed far behind other public chains. On-chain data is exploding, but the price hasn't kept up? Uh, I've heard too many stories like that, and they all ended in a plunge. If you're waiting for a valuation re-assessment, you'll be waiting until the flowers wither.

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 2025-12-25 23:35

It's the same old story... Can switching from dual-track to single-track save SEI, or is it just another "strategic adjustment"?

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 2025-12-25 23:32

Dual-track cuts can still lead to a rise; I somewhat understand this logic but not entirely. However, on-chain data is exploding while the coin price remains at rock bottom, which is indeed a bit outrageous... Who can withstand this period while waiting for market reactions?

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 2025-12-25 23:31

Dual-track to single-track, sounds good but in execution... I wonder if it will turn into another "wolf is coming" scenario. Trading volume explodes but the price still drops, I've seen this many times. Only when the ecosystem truly develops will I believe it.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 2025-12-25 23:23

Doing subtraction to grow bigger, this logic makes sense. After trying dual tracks for so long, the results are still average. It's better to bet on a single-threaded EVM. On-chain data is exploding, and the coin price is still lying low. Such misalignment will eventually be corrected.

View OriginalReply0