Found something interesting while reviewing my top tracks this year—AI-generated music ranked as my number 5 most played. And honestly? I think people are overthinking this.
The whole 'AI music is bad' narrative needs a reality check. It's not a threat to creativity, it's expanding what's possible. Yeah, sure, there are concerns worth discussing—copyright issues, authenticity in the art world, that sort of thing. But dismissing it outright misses the actual opportunity.
Think about it: AI tools are making music production accessible to people who couldn't afford studio time or formal training before. Independent creators can experiment faster. The collaboration between human intent and algorithmic precision? That's genuinely interesting from a production standpoint.
The real question isn't whether AI music is 'good' or 'bad'—it's about how we integrate it into existing creative ecosystems. On-chain music rights, decentralized creator platforms, new monetization models for collaborative AI-human tracks. That's where the conversation should be heading.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropCollector
· 2025-12-28 16:20
I understand, but copyright is really an unavoidable hurdle; otherwise, how would creators make a living?
By the way, on-chain music rights sound pretty good, but who is actually doing it now...
AI-generated top 5? Honestly, I'm quite curious about what style they are.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 2025-12-28 08:48
NGL, AI music is already in the top 5, and it's pretty impressive. This mess has just been demonized by traditional musicians.
The essence of AI making music is to lower the barriers, so how does that become a threat... On-chain copyright is actually more worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 2025-12-27 07:27
NGL, after AI music became popular, everyone really overreacted. I think what this guy said is not wrong.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeater
· 2025-12-25 22:49
Good morning, 2 a.m. AI music ranks in the top five, this is the new liquidity trap—cheap capacity swallows up the creative premium, and then everyone is fighting for the same piece of the pie.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 2025-12-25 22:40
I think your perspective is quite valid, but the copyright aspect is indeed a tricky area... Currently, there is no standard solution for on-chain copyright verification.
View OriginalReply0
SybilSlayer
· 2025-12-25 22:38
ngl I quite buy into this logic, much more clear-headed than those who outright dismiss AI.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 2025-12-25 22:37
NGL AI music is really not that scary; instead, it opens up new possibilities. This is what Web3 should be doing.
Found something interesting while reviewing my top tracks this year—AI-generated music ranked as my number 5 most played. And honestly? I think people are overthinking this.
The whole 'AI music is bad' narrative needs a reality check. It's not a threat to creativity, it's expanding what's possible. Yeah, sure, there are concerns worth discussing—copyright issues, authenticity in the art world, that sort of thing. But dismissing it outright misses the actual opportunity.
Think about it: AI tools are making music production accessible to people who couldn't afford studio time or formal training before. Independent creators can experiment faster. The collaboration between human intent and algorithmic precision? That's genuinely interesting from a production standpoint.
The real question isn't whether AI music is 'good' or 'bad'—it's about how we integrate it into existing creative ecosystems. On-chain music rights, decentralized creator platforms, new monetization models for collaborative AI-human tracks. That's where the conversation should be heading.