So-called "regulation" often functions as outright censorship in practice. The distinction between legitimate oversight and suppression of speech becomes increasingly blurred when authorities use regulatory frameworks to silence dissent or limit information flow.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsPolice
· 2025-12-28 18:55
Under the guise of regulation, what is really being done is silencing. Claims of legitimate regulation are just a facade; once they have power, they want to shut people up. I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 2025-12-26 19:50
Regulation and censorship are two sides of the same coin. In simple terms, whoever holds the power gets to play the game.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 2025-12-25 21:56
Regulation is just a new form of censorship, there's basically no difference.
View OriginalReply0
BoredRiceBall
· 2025-12-25 21:38
Suppressing speech under the guise of regulation has been a common and widespread issue for a long time, really.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 2025-12-25 21:33
The boundaries of regulation and censorship have long been blurred beyond recognition. To put it plainly, it's speech control disguised under the guise of legality.
So-called "regulation" often functions as outright censorship in practice. The distinction between legitimate oversight and suppression of speech becomes increasingly blurred when authorities use regulatory frameworks to silence dissent or limit information flow.