2025-12-25 20:20:43

You might just press and hold the screen in other communities; but here, it's different.

We're not looking for "traders," but for people who are genuinely willing to participate. Every member has a voice — participating in governance decisions, supervising project progress, sharing ecological benefits — these are not empty words.

But rights and obligations always come together. Whatever you can do, commit to it; even the smallest contribution is a force driving the community forward. Some write analyses, some spread information, some review security — every role is important.

This kind of transformation may seem simple, but in reality, it turns a group of individuals acting independently into a true community. That sense of belonging? It doesn't come from how many coins you've bought, but from truly doing something for this place.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredWatcher

· 2025-12-28 20:02

It sounds good, but how many people can really stick with it? I think most people are still thinking about easy money; once they have to work hard, they start slacking off.

View OriginalReply0

Token_Sherpa

· 2025-12-28 11:10

nah this is just governance theater if the incentive design doesn't align actual contributors with token holders... seen this play out a thousand times before

Reply0

StealthDeployer

· 2025-12-27 23:27

Really? That sounds quite tempting, but the key still depends on actual implementation. Can engagement truly support governance? Or will it just be dominated by big influencers? Every small contribution counts, I agree, but how to ensure you won't be exploited?

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 2025-12-25 20:50

That sounds nice, but how many people can truly stick with it?

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 2025-12-25 20:49

Alright, this is what a true DAO should look like. Otherwise, it's just centralized money-grading under the guise of decentralization.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 2025-12-25 20:40

The words sound nice, but I'm afraid it's just a slogan. Are there really that many people willing to contribute proactively rather than just waiting for dividends?

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 2025-12-25 20:32

This community model sounds good, but how many people are truly willing to contribute? --- Basically, it's about wanting volunteers, but don't make me feel like I'm getting something for nothing. --- I agree with the logic of rights and obligations being equal, but the key is how to prevent the balance of power from collapsing in the later stages. --- Another big talker, let's see how long they can stick to it. --- I like this approach, but a sense of belonging needs to be built gradually; it can't be rushed. --- People who actually do things are really fewer than those who just hold coins, even if the words sound nice. --- Finally, someone has spoken the truth, but execution is the real challenge.

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 2025-12-25 20:31

That sounds good, but how many people can truly persist in making contributions?

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster