A corporate invoice worth millions of dollars just sitting in a safe is like a fully charged battery that isn't connected—full of energy but unusable. In reality, these receivables often take 30 to 90 days to realize, causing small and medium-sized enterprises to face liquidity challenges. However, by 2025, on-chain technology has gradually transformed this situation. Through invoice tokenization protocols, these paper assets can directly connect to the global liquidity markets, fundamentally achieving asset digitization and value release.
**Level 1: Off-Chain Authenticity Verification**
Tokenization doesn't start with smart contracts but with legal and audit processes. Each invoice entering the system must undergo strict commercial authenticity verification. This step is to establish a trust foundation for the assets. Typically, compliant third-party oracles or legal service providers are employed to verify the trade contracts, logistics records, and the debtor’s repayment ability behind the invoice. Only then can the on-chain records correspond to real, existing commercial claims, rather than fictitious certificates.
**Level 2: Legal Framework Construction**
To enable off-chain assets to exist on-chain, legal design is necessary. This usually involves establishing a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) as the legal owner of the on-chain assets. The existence of the SPV ensures the correspondence between off-chain ownership and on-chain tokens, serving as a critical infrastructure for the compliant operation of RWA (Real World Assets). Under current regulatory frameworks, this step is indispensable.
**Level 3: On-Chain Liquidity Activation**
After completing the first two steps, the tokenized invoices can circulate in trading markets. Enterprises can realize accounts receivable early, and investors gain a new type of income asset. This process completely breaks the time gap in traditional finance, revitalizing dormant enterprise assets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 8h ago
Wait, can the SPV setup really hold up? It still seems to depend on how the regulators are going to spin it.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but in reality, SPV might end up stalling a bunch of projects.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 8h ago
The battery analogy is spot on, but the authenticity verification still feels like a big pitfall. Are oracles reliable?
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but who will bear the burden of this SPV layer? Is it risk transfer or risk concealment?
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 8h ago
Invoice tokenization sounds good, but the key still depends on whether the SPV and oracle are reliable... If there's an issue with off-chain verification, on-chain is useless.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 9h ago
Invoice tokenization is easy to talk about, but when it comes to implementation, it still gets stuck at the SPV stage. What about domestic regulation? Don't let the on-chain activity become active only to be blocked offline later.
A corporate invoice worth millions of dollars just sitting in a safe is like a fully charged battery that isn't connected—full of energy but unusable. In reality, these receivables often take 30 to 90 days to realize, causing small and medium-sized enterprises to face liquidity challenges. However, by 2025, on-chain technology has gradually transformed this situation. Through invoice tokenization protocols, these paper assets can directly connect to the global liquidity markets, fundamentally achieving asset digitization and value release.
**Level 1: Off-Chain Authenticity Verification**
Tokenization doesn't start with smart contracts but with legal and audit processes. Each invoice entering the system must undergo strict commercial authenticity verification. This step is to establish a trust foundation for the assets. Typically, compliant third-party oracles or legal service providers are employed to verify the trade contracts, logistics records, and the debtor’s repayment ability behind the invoice. Only then can the on-chain records correspond to real, existing commercial claims, rather than fictitious certificates.
**Level 2: Legal Framework Construction**
To enable off-chain assets to exist on-chain, legal design is necessary. This usually involves establishing a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) as the legal owner of the on-chain assets. The existence of the SPV ensures the correspondence between off-chain ownership and on-chain tokens, serving as a critical infrastructure for the compliant operation of RWA (Real World Assets). Under current regulatory frameworks, this step is indispensable.
**Level 3: On-Chain Liquidity Activation**
After completing the first two steps, the tokenized invoices can circulate in trading markets. Enterprises can realize accounts receivable early, and investors gain a new type of income asset. This process completely breaks the time gap in traditional finance, revitalizing dormant enterprise assets.