2025-12-25 14:22:05

On-chain data presents a fascinating phenomenon: the total network hash rate of DOGE has significantly declined, while the miners who remain steadfast have seen their earnings double—an almost 40% month-over-month increase. The logic behind this is actually quite harsh—some miners have chosen to shut down under short-term volatility pressures, leading to a spontaneous market cleanup.

Meanwhile, another signal comes from the space sector. Elon Musk has officially confirmed that the launch window for the "DOGE-1" lunar mission has been locked in for the end of 2025—this is no longer a joke but a real commercial plan. For the first time in history, space services paid directly with cryptocurrency are about to become a reality.

Interestingly, the market's reaction has been surprisingly calm. Compared to the crazy times of 2021 when a single tweet could rally 30%, this "moon landing" news only stirred a gentle ripple. This temperature difference itself indicates one thing: **The revaluation of Meme coins is undergoing a test of reality**.

If DOGE-1 truly succeeds in reaching the Moon, what does it mean? First, a breakthrough in identity—from a meme coin online to an asset that has actually paid for space services. Second, an elevation in narrative—opening a window for cryptocurrency to be applied in real commercial scenarios, and even in broader economic fields.

Currently, DOGE stands at a complex crossroads: macro tightening by the Federal Reserve is suppressing risk assets, and technical indicators are repeatedly confirming critical levels. It is no longer just an emotional proxy asset but is also using a real physical event to perform an ultimate valuation of its own worth.

So the question boils down to this: Do you think this "moon landing" is a turning point for DOGE to shed its joke label and truly initiate a revaluation of its value? Or is it just another classic pattern of "good news exhausted, then a reversal"?

DOGE0,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
2
Share

Comment

0/400

ResearchChadButBroke

· 12-28 13:37

Honestly, the real story is that miner profits have doubled, while the moon landing is a bit虚 The good news has been exhausted, and this wave is likely to be less fortunate than fortunate It's another "miracle" story that the market has already priced in to death Can't even wait until the end of 2025, it feels like it's already a settled matter Reasonable suspicion that this is just public opinion hype and the final wave of harvesting To be honest, miners who can hold on have already made money; they can't wait for the moon landing benefits Judging by the market's reaction temperature, I think the bottom has already been touched Elon Musk memes are overused, the crypto circle should wake up Hash rate decline and miner clearing are the most genuine signals Moon landing? Maybe it's just the last chance for retail investors to get on board

View OriginalReply0

MrRightClick

· 12-26 22:35

Hash rate decline actually increases miner profits—that's market self-correction, indicating that those still active are true players. Honestly, wait until the end of 2025 to talk about moon landing. Speculating on expectations now is just too foolish. It's normal for the market to react indifferently. Who still believes in crazy talk like "a single tweet causes a 30% surge"? If DOGE really spends money on space, that would be a real industry-level endorsement. But the prerequisite is that it actually goes up there. Instead of waiting for the moon landing, it's better to see when the Federal Reserve will stop. That will be the decisive factor. I've seen the routine of meme coins becoming legitimate assets too many times. Every time, it's the same story, and then what? The 40% profit for steadfast miners is the interesting part, indicating that liquidation is indeed happening.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-55d85e8b

· 12-25 20:24

Christmas to the Moon! 🌕

Reply0

Sukoi

· 12-25 15:25

HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪HODL Tight 💪

Reply0

Sukoi

· 12-25 15:24

HODL Tight 💪

Reply0

fomo_fighter

· 12-25 14:52

Wait, is the market really calm? Why do I feel like it hasn't reacted yet? Honestly, the launch is not until the end of 2025. It's a bit too early to start speculating now. It's better to wait until it gets closer before jumping in. The doubling of miner profits is the real signal, indicating that the market is self-repairing and not just a false hype.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 12-25 14:45

Miner shutdown clearing out, but those who stay actually make a huge profit. This is true survival of the fittest. No one gets excited when the lunar landing mission is locked in? It shows everyone has learned to be smart. To turn around the meme coin, you need some real substance. A tweet in 2021 could boost 30%—that’s really outrageous. Now the market is much more mature, and news is no longer the main driver. It feels like DOGE is just a gamble this time. If it succeeds, it will be a revolutionary breakthrough; if it fails, it will just continue to be a joke coin. The key still depends on real money. Under the environment of the Federal Reserve, risk assets are suppressed tightly. No matter how fancy the lunar landing is, it cannot change the macro situation.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 12-25 14:28

What does it mean for miner earnings to double? Still the same—retail investors who buy the dip will always be the last buyers. Moon landing? The idea of pumping the market is no longer effective. Now I just hear these news stories and they go in one ear and out the other. I'm numb to it.

View OriginalReply0