2025-12-25 13:25:06

The decentralized currency BURN has been launched for over two years, with impressive market performance—initially circulating 21 million tokens and now reduced to 12.4 million, an increase of over a thousand times. What is the driving force behind this? The dual burning mechanism design makes continuous deflation possible, rather than just a paper promise. Two years of storms and rain have witnessed the community's evolution from small to large, and those who stay are basically true believers. Now, with the support of the ecological protocol, many people are beginning to discuss whether BURN has a chance to challenge its all-time high again. Of course, such projects always carry risks, but from a fundamental perspective, the combination of shrinking volume + active community + ecological development is indeed worth paying attention to. The market will provide the answer.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropBlackHole

· 12-27 17:54

The deflationary mechanism is truly effective, not just on paper. This point definitely deserves applause.

View OriginalReply0

ContractSurrender

· 12-27 07:40

A thousandfold increase? Really? That number sounds too good to be true. But the deflationary mechanism did impress me, at least it's not just empty talk. Dual combustion is indeed interesting, definitely better than those who only shout slogans. But the all-time high... let's not get our hopes too high; risks are always present. Those who survive two years are true fans, I believe that. The community fundamentals are good, but the ecological development depends on how things follow through. I've been paying attention to BURN for a long time; shrinking volume is the way to go. It all depends on whether the market is willing to buy in. Honestly, the fundamentals are good, but don't go all in; risks definitely exist. The market is the most honest. Deflation from 21 million to 12.4 million is quite a feat. But I'm worried it might just be a flash in the pan. True believers? Haha, sticking around for two years isn't easy. But stories like a thousandfold... just listen and forget about it. Ecological support sounds good, but the key is whether it can truly be implemented. Too many promises on paper.

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 12-25 13:51

The dual combustion mechanism is reliable, but I'm just worried it might turn out to be another air coin story.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 12-25 13:40

The deflation drops to 12.4 million coins. This number is indeed intense. But only the tough ones can survive a thousandfold increase.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 12-25 13:38

The talk about deflation has been more talk than action, and BURN has really been serious these past two years, burning from 21 million to 12.4 million. The data is right here. A thousandfold increase didn't come for nothing; I have to admit that the dual burning mechanism is no joke.

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 12-25 13:34

The dual combustion mechanism is indeed not just talk; the deflation data is right there. True believers still claim that the community hasn't run out of steam, which adds points. A thousandfold increase is a big hype, but what about the risks... still need to be cautious. Can BURN take off again? The combination of reduced volume + ecosystem does have potential. Having survived two years, only the believers remain; such projects are actually more likely to produce dark horses. In plain terms, it's about waiting for market reactions; data doesn't lie.

View OriginalReply0