The choice between different FDV levels shapes incentive structures in profound ways. When we evaluated dropping to $99.99m, cancelling the early unlock option became theoretically possible—a bold move that could have reshaped holder economics. It's an unconventional incentive design worth exploring. However, the practical constraints kicked in: we ultimately had to set the early exit threshold at $300m FDV instead. Sometimes elegant tokenomics designs collide with real-world parameters. The decision reflects the tension between what's theoretically optimal and what's operationally feasible in token launch mechanics.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTradervip
· 12-28 01:19
Basically, the ideal is very grand, but reality is quite tough. The 99.99m plan sounds great, but when it comes to implementation, compromises are necessary. The 300m plan is still okay; at least early investors can still make a profit.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrowniesvip
· 12-27 03:02
999m vs 300m, still have to compromise with reality. Ideals are great, but engineering is the real challenge.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 12-25 13:52
99.99m that theory is possible in principle, but once implemented, compromises are necessary. That's the crypto world for you—perfect solutions always die in reality.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 12-25 13:52
lmao the $300m compromise is just governance theater disguised as pragmatism. they'll always pick the "feasible" path over what actually disrupts the incentive structure... classic protocol cowardice dressed up as tokenomics wisdom
Reply0
DaoTherapyvip
· 12-25 13:51
In plain terms, the ideal is very full but the reality is very bleak. The 99.9m plan sounds impressive, but in the end, it still has to be compromised to 300m. Web3's old problem.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsdvip
· 12-25 13:42
Alright, the ideal is very full, but the reality is very bleak. The 99.99m plan sounds really attractive, but in the end, we still have to compromise to 300m. This is the fate of Web3 projects...
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketmanvip
· 12-25 13:31
It sounds like the ideal is very grand, but the reality is quite harsh... The 99.99m launch window is beautiful, but once the data is checked, it falls apart. In the end, it still has to be set according to the 300m gravity level.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)