Wait, something doesn't quite add up here. Everyone's talking about this deflationary model, but are we really expecting mass token burns to drive scarcity?
Here's what bugs me: if the team's doing OTC deals whenever they need operational capital, doesn't that just dump supply back into circulation? The math seems off. You can't claim deflationary tokenomics while simultaneously selling tokens off-market to cover expenses. That's... just inflation with extra steps?
Unless there's a legit burn mechanism tied to revenue or usage that actually outpaces OTC sales, this whole narrative falls apart. Anyone got hard data on the burn rate versus OTC volume?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
APY追逐者
· 14h ago
It's the same old rhetoric again... As soon as there's an OTC dump, the burn mechanism is just empty talk. Who would believe it?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 14h ago
Not gonna lie, I'm already tired of hearing this spiel—it's all the same tricks... The burn mechanism gets offset by OTC, there's no way the numbers will actually look good.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptain
· 14h ago
Ha, yet another deflationary myth shattered. I've seen this trick many times: OTC dumping plus burn propaganda—it's all just word games.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 14h ago
Oh, here we go again with the same rhetoric. Dumping hard on OTC and still have the nerve to talk about deflation? You're just fooling yourself.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 14h ago
It's the same old "we have black magic deflation" nonsense... As soon as there's OTC selling, the deflation is dead. This logic is full of holes like a sieve.
Wait, something doesn't quite add up here. Everyone's talking about this deflationary model, but are we really expecting mass token burns to drive scarcity?
Here's what bugs me: if the team's doing OTC deals whenever they need operational capital, doesn't that just dump supply back into circulation? The math seems off. You can't claim deflationary tokenomics while simultaneously selling tokens off-market to cover expenses. That's... just inflation with extra steps?
Unless there's a legit burn mechanism tied to revenue or usage that actually outpaces OTC sales, this whole narrative falls apart. Anyone got hard data on the burn rate versus OTC volume?