As someone deeply embedded in the Solana ecosystem, my driving mission is simple: support every builder here to ship and win.



So when I stumbled upon a bridge that only had half its user-facing implementation live—conveniently just the Solana-to-Base direction—I had to pause. Why would a critical piece of infrastructure launch incomplete? The asymmetry feels deliberate, and that raises questions about priorities and incentives in cross-chain tooling.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblindvip
· 12-07 09:58
A half-baked product launch? Whose fault is that? Honestly, it's just a lack of focus.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFTvip
· 12-07 09:57
Wait, it's only one-way? Isn't this just an unfinished product going live, just like those abandoned NFT projects last year? If market sentiment reverses, this kind of infrastructure flaw instantly becomes a "bearish signal"...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 12-07 09:57
Damn, they dare to launch a half-baked bridge? A one-way channel from Solana to Base—who designed this?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustlervip
· 12-07 09:47
Hmm... a one-way bridge? What kind of weird design is this, it feels like they're setting a trap on purpose.
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverChartsvip
· 12-07 09:33
Hmm... this bridge only went halfway? So basically, they just want to drain value one-way, huh?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)