So someone actually needed permission to operate on a "permissioned" chain, and people are genuinely upset about it?
The irony writes itself. That's literally the whole point of permissioned blockchains—controlled access by design. Yet folks act shocked when gatekeeping happens on a gated network.
Wild times.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FreeRider
· 16h ago
Ha, isn't this just digging your own hole and insisting on jumping in?
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 12-08 13:05
Haha, this is what you call slapping yourself in the face. Why pretend to be decentralized when you're making a chain with barriers to entry?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 12-07 09:57
Haha, that's funny. You want to use a permissioned chain and still think no one will control you? Isn't that just fooling yourself?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichHunter
· 12-07 09:56
ngl this is just ridiculous, you want freedom on a permissioned chain? Then why don't you just use a public chain haha
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 12-07 09:45
Haha, isn't this just self-contradictory? Wanting the convenience of a permissioned chain but not wanting to be regulated—where in the world does such a good deal exist?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 12-07 09:44
Haha, these people are really something. Why are they so surprised? They're on a permissioned chain but still want a permissionless experience? Where's their brain?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 12-07 09:41
Haha, this is the typical "I want freedom but also decentralization" contradictory persona. They chose a private chain but still want the benefits of a public chain—serves them right.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 12-07 09:38
Haha, this logic is really something. You want permissionless freedom after moving to a permissioned chain?
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 12-07 09:31
Haha, this is hilarious. A permissioned chain still needs to be permissioned— isn’t this just nesting permissions within permissions?
So someone actually needed permission to operate on a "permissioned" chain, and people are genuinely upset about it?
The irony writes itself. That's literally the whole point of permissioned blockchains—controlled access by design. Yet folks act shocked when gatekeeping happens on a gated network.
Wild times.