After three years in the crypto world, what crazy things haven’t I seen?



One buddy started with $30,000 and ran it up to $300,000 in just half a month, so excited he couldn’t sleep. The result? He went all-in at the top, and seven days later his account balance was down to four digits—he even had to think twice about buying a pack of cigarettes. On the other hand, there’s this Zen-like player, trading slowly and steadily, making only 50% profit in a year. Doesn’t look impressive, but for three years straight, he hasn’t lost a cent of his principal.

At the end of the day, this game isn’t about luck. Who really gets the last laugh? It comes down to two hard skills: tight position management and accurate trend prediction. These are way more useful than chasing rumors every day.

Let’s talk about position management first—it’s saved a lot of people.

Recently, a friend from Jiangsu came to me in a panic. He’d gone all in with $68,000 on a hot coin, and after a 15% pullback, $10,200 was wiped out just like that. His nerves were shot, finger hovering over the sell button.

I stopped him from doing anything rash and handed him my lifesaving method I’ve used for three years—the “Five-Part Position Method”:

- Divide your total funds equally into five parts, never use more than one part for a single trade, and never go all-in;
- Set a safety line for each trade, capping the max loss per trade at 2% of total funds (which works out to about a 10%-12% stop loss per coin);
- Set a minimum take-profit target at 50%, and keep your risk-reward ratio above 5:1.

In plain English: when you win, you eat well; when you lose, it’s just a scratch.

He reallocated into ZEC using this system. The first three trades: two losses, one win—which didn’t look great at first. But the final tally? Net profit of 33%. Not only did he cover his previous losses, he actually made money.

See the point? Making money in crypto isn’t about who wins the fastest—it’s about who can afford to lose. Even if you lose five out of ten trades, as long as your winners are big enough, you’re still the winner.
ZEC3.22%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Gm_Gn_Merchantvip
· 14h ago
It's that same position management rhetoric again. You're not wrong, but I just can't listen to it. Who can resist the thrill of going all in?
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroupvip
· 15h ago
I really can't tell the difference—some people can turn 30,000 into 300,000, so how did I end up with just four digits? Going all-in is something you learn in just one try, but the price is too high. Splitting into five positions sounds good, but it still depends on execution. Surviving in this space is much harder than making quick money, seriously.
View OriginalReply0
FishWaitingForSnowvip
· 12-07 02:38
Just go for it 💪
View OriginalReply0
FishWaitingForSnowvip
· 12-07 02:38
Just go for it 💪
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMinervip
· 12-07 00:48
Going all in feels good for a moment, but you end up back where you started. This guy is truly a negative example in the crypto world—turned $30,000 into $300,000 and still wasn't satisfied, insisted on going all in and lost it all. I'm speechless.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMevip
· 12-07 00:44
Honestly, that guy who goes all-in is a typical gambler, thinking the crypto space is a casino. Splitting into five positions is indeed reliable, but to be honest, most people still can't control their own hands.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 12-07 00:42
Here we go again. No matter how many times position management is emphasized, some people just don’t listen—those who go all-in are always the first to get wiped out. That being said, the five-part position splitting method really does save your life, but it’s such a psychological grind to stick to it. You watch others making ten or twenty times their money while you’re still painstakingly splitting your positions... But I guess that’s the price for lasting longer in the game.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 12-07 00:41
That guy who went all-in with his entire position is probably still regretting it. Don't ask me how I know...
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 12-07 00:36
What you said is absolutely right, but how many people can truly stick to five-part position sizing? I've seen too many people lose their composure as soon as there's a pullback.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoetvip
· 12-07 00:33
Five-part position management is really amazing. I used to be the guy who went all-in with full positions, and now I've even quit biting my nails. --- Easier said than done. How many people can really stick to dividing their funds into five parts? Nine out of ten still can't help but go all in. --- A risk-reward ratio of 5:1 sounds harsh, but it's truly a lifeline. I'm following this standard now. --- That "Buddhist" player is really a winner. He hasn't lost his principal in three years. I respect him as a real man. --- The most heartbreaking part is that saying, "It's about who can afford to lose." To put it plainly, it's all about mindset and self-discipline. 99% of people in crypto lose because of those two things. --- How did you manage to get 33% on that ZEC trade? The timing felt perfect. I need to study it.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)