Spent some time digging through the Alignerz whitepaper — went back for a second read because the first pass left me curious.



Here's the thing: they're tackling some real structural issues in token distribution. The vesting-based allocation model they're proposing? Way smarter than those tiny micro-allocations most projects throw around. That alone caught my attention.

But there's a catch. And it's not a small one.

If the team doesn't stay nimble and keep iterating on their design, this could backfire. The model works in theory, but execution matters more than the whitepaper admits. New problems could surface fast — especially around liquidity timing and early participant behavior.

Still, the core insight is solid. Just hoping they don't get too attached to their initial framework.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 5h ago
The whitepaper is indeed impressive, but real execution is the true game-changer. Whether this team can iterate is the key.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Groupvip
· 5h ago
The whitepaper looks good, but I'm just worried the team won't execute well... I've seen too many projects where the theory is perfect, but reality falls short.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruantvip
· 5h ago
NGL vesting model is indeed better than those crappy micro-allocations, but just because I’m optimistic doesn’t mean there aren’t any pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)