This time, the regulators really saved the market. They directly rejected applications for those 3x and 5x leveraged ETFs—a decision that may seem conservative, but is actually very wise.
We looked through historical data, and in the past five years, the underlying assets for these proposed products experienced daily swings exceeding 33% on 350 occasions. What does that mean? If these high-leverage products had actually been launched, they would have triggered forced liquidations about once a week on average. And if a monster-level 5x leverage product had been approved, the frequency would be even higher.
The data doesn’t lie. Imagine a scenario where products are being liquidated every week—not only would investors suffer, but overall market confidence would be dragged down. Even those issuers who applied for 3x leverage should actually be thankful—if such products were really launched, the subsequent troubles and public backlash would be quite a headache for them.
Right now, the 2x leveraged single-stock ETFs on the market are already capable of creating wild volatility—there’s really no need to go further. Sometimes, not approving something is actually the best protection for everyone.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoTarotReader
· 11h ago
Good thing I said no, otherwise something would have gone wrong again.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrain
· 12h ago
Damn, getting liquidated once a week? This is literally a trap for retail investors. 5x leverage is basically a harvesting machine.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 13h ago
Honestly, there's nothing wrong with this regulation. Getting liquidated once a week? That's just ridiculous—the market would have collapsed long ago.
This time, the regulators really saved the market. They directly rejected applications for those 3x and 5x leveraged ETFs—a decision that may seem conservative, but is actually very wise.
We looked through historical data, and in the past five years, the underlying assets for these proposed products experienced daily swings exceeding 33% on 350 occasions. What does that mean? If these high-leverage products had actually been launched, they would have triggered forced liquidations about once a week on average. And if a monster-level 5x leverage product had been approved, the frequency would be even higher.
The data doesn’t lie. Imagine a scenario where products are being liquidated every week—not only would investors suffer, but overall market confidence would be dragged down. Even those issuers who applied for 3x leverage should actually be thankful—if such products were really launched, the subsequent troubles and public backlash would be quite a headache for them.
Right now, the 2x leveraged single-stock ETFs on the market are already capable of creating wild volatility—there’s really no need to go further. Sometimes, not approving something is actually the best protection for everyone.