This wave of hype is really rare—it's unusual for a single crypto event to stay hot for this long.



No matter how the "fake donation scandal" ends, I actually think the incident itself is quite interesting—and for the entire industry, it might not be a bad thing. At the very least, it’s made everyone start to re-examine a few things.

Someone from a major exchange talked about this at a meeting, and what they said was pretty blunt: basically, it’s really hard for platforms to predict how much noise a single KOL can make. While that sounds a bit like passing the buck, it does reveal a real issue: in a decentralized world, individual influence is getting harder and harder to control.

At the end of the day, this industry is still growing. These kinds of rifts and controversies might actually force some rules to slowly take shape.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
staking_grampsvip
· 11h ago
I’ve looked into the fake donation incident, and the platform’s excuse for shifting the blame really doesn’t hold up. Influencer influence got out of control? Then what’s the point of your review process? Just because the industry is in a growth phase, you think you can shirk responsibility at will? I really don’t get this logic. The most interesting thing about this incident is that suddenly a bunch of people started caring about the rules—ironic, isn’t it? If the platform wants to shift the blame, just be more straightforward about it. Don’t beat around the bush. I don’t see any positive impact this has on the industry. Instead, it’s just another new trick for fleecing the community.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Brovip
· 11h ago
The donation fraud scandal has been hyped for so long, which shows that the crypto space still has its stories. The exchanges aren’t wrong about KOL influence getting out of control, but the question is—can the rules really be established?
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleepsvip
· 12h ago
Ha, the exchange’s statement sounds like they’re passing the buck, but to be honest, it really hits the sore spot. Decentralization biting its own people—pretty ironic. The donation fraud actually brought the problem to light, making things clearer than ever. The issue of KOL influence getting out of control isn’t new at all; it should have been regulated long ago. Growing pains like this are inevitable in the industry’s development phase—nothing we can do but keep watching. The fact that the hype has lasted this long proves people in crypto really love gossip, haha. Things will keep being chaotic until rules are established, so everyone should be mentally prepared. Feels like platforms are using KOLs as scapegoats—they want the traffic but also want to come out unscathed. Is this considered a collective awakening for the industry? Let’s hope so. It’s definitely interesting, but how things are handled next is the real test.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706cvip
· 12h ago
I've said it before, this wave is a precursor to an industry reshuffle. Seizing the window of opportunity created by new rules is the key to gaining the upper hand.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)