One billionaire basically rescued free speech on a major platform. Think about that—the First Amendment, the thing that supposedly keeps us from sliding into authoritarianism, needed a single guy with deep pockets to prop it up online.



Right now? His platform's the only big one where you can actually say what you think without getting nuked. That's both impressive and terrifying. What happens when decentralization isn't just a crypto buzzword but a necessity for basic rights?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DiamondHandsvip
· 23h ago
NGL, this is really wild. In the end, freedom of speech has to be saved by a billionaire. What does that say?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 23h ago
To be honest, it's pretty ridiculous that a billionaire has to save freedom of speech... Should matters of the Constitution really depend on individual wealthy people? There's something wrong with that logic.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 23h ago
A billionaire saved free speech—ironic, isn’t it? The Constitution actually has to rely on the wealthy to defend it.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreathervip
· 23h ago
To be honest, it's absurd that a billionaire saved free speech.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarbervip
· 23h ago
A billionaire saved free speech. The more you think about it, the scarier it gets... True decentralization is the real solution.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)