The countdown's on—Do Kwon's sentencing drops in 6 days (December 11). Prosecutors aren't playing around: they want 12 years for the Terra/UST implosion, branding it a "$40 billion colossal fraud." The scale? Absolutely staggering. But here's where it gets interesting: could the judge go softer? Some whispers suggest maybe 5 years instead. Kwon's legal team is definitely pushing for leniency. The crypto world's watching closely—this verdict might set the tone for how regulators handle future meltdowns. Twelve years feels harsh to some, justified to others. Either way, this case isn't just about one founder. It's about accountability when billions vanish overnight. What's your take—too lenient or fair game?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerNgmi
· 9h ago
4 billion USD vanished into thin air—are even 12 years not enough, or what?
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 11h ago
4 billion dollars just gone like that, unbelievable. This guy's gotta pay the price for it, right?
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 12h ago
Whether it's 12 years or 5 years, it doesn't change the fact that the crypto space has already collapsed... The key is, we'll still fall into the same pitfalls next time.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 12h ago
Yeah, 12 years is really harsh, but losing 4 billion definitely deserves some consequences... The real worry is if the sentence is too light, it might actually encourage others to rug pull in the future.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 12h ago
You think you can just brush off losing $4 billion? Keep dreaming.
The countdown's on—Do Kwon's sentencing drops in 6 days (December 11). Prosecutors aren't playing around: they want 12 years for the Terra/UST implosion, branding it a "$40 billion colossal fraud." The scale? Absolutely staggering. But here's where it gets interesting: could the judge go softer? Some whispers suggest maybe 5 years instead. Kwon's legal team is definitely pushing for leniency. The crypto world's watching closely—this verdict might set the tone for how regulators handle future meltdowns. Twelve years feels harsh to some, justified to others. Either way, this case isn't just about one founder. It's about accountability when billions vanish overnight. What's your take—too lenient or fair game?