Something feels off here. Federal housing regulators are now pushing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to roll out VantageScore 4.0—a credit scoring model supposedly designed with "inclusion" in mind. The pitch? It opens the door for 33 million new borrowers to qualify for mortgages.



But here's the catch: default rates could spike by as much as 20%.

Sound familiar? Government pressure to expand lending to high-risk borrowers played a massive role in the 2008 housing meltdown. Yet career officials at the Federal Housing Finance Agency seem ready to go down that road again. Lower credit thresholds, higher systemic risk—and taxpayers left holding the bag when it blows up.

Who benefits when the system's designed to fail?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaRecktvip
· 7h ago
Once again, it's the guise of "inclusivity." Are we going through the same playbook as 2008? I just want to know who the hell actually made any money.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92vip
· 8h ago
33 million new borrowers? Sounds just like the scheme from 2008, here we go again...
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignalvip
· 8h ago
Is it going to be a repeat of the 2008 script? Under the guise of inclusivity, they're just lowering the bar, and when it all blows up, we'll be the ones footing the bill again.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 8h ago
33 million people can borrow money, but the default rate soars to 20%? Isn't this just a repeat of 2008...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)