Remember when Inigo Fraser Jenkins dropped that bombshell comparison? He literally said passive investing posed a bigger threat to society than Marxism itself. Wild statement, right? But here's the kicker - the analyst just doubled down. Turns out his original hot take might've been too soft. He's now suggesting the reality is even grimmer than that already inflammatory framing. Makes you wonder what data he's been crunching lately. The shift from "worse than Marxism" to "that was still being generous" is quite the escalation in market philosophy critique.