Kevin Hassett just dropped some heavy commentary on executive trade powers. According to him, the administration holds full authority to declare emergencies and regulate trade through tariffs or quotas when threats emerge. His logic? If there's an emergency situation, you need tools to manage trade flows—and tariffs plus quotas are the primary levers available.
What's particularly interesting is his mention of a "backup plan" even if the Supreme Court pushes back on their approach. This suggests they've war-gamed potential legal challenges and have alternative regulatory pathways ready to deploy.
For markets, this kind of policy flexibility creates uncertainty. Tariff adjustments can shift capital flows overnight, impact corporate earnings across sectors, and alter risk appetite for both traditional and digital assets. Worth monitoring how this plays out.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApe
· 10h ago
NGL, Hassett's whole thing just sounds like a way to shift the blame... all that talk about "emergency" and "backup plans," to put it bluntly, it just means they'll do whatever they want.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 10h ago
Starting to play the "state of emergency" card again? To put it bluntly, it's just a way to open a backdoor for themselves to gain trade privileges.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 10h ago
It's the same old "emergency powers" rhetoric, give me a break.
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWallet
· 10h ago
Ready... Are you going to pull the emergency powers card again at this critical moment?
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 10h ago
Here we go again. At critical moments, they just declare a "state of emergency"—no matter how they explain it, it always makes sense for them...
Kevin Hassett just dropped some heavy commentary on executive trade powers. According to him, the administration holds full authority to declare emergencies and regulate trade through tariffs or quotas when threats emerge. His logic? If there's an emergency situation, you need tools to manage trade flows—and tariffs plus quotas are the primary levers available.
What's particularly interesting is his mention of a "backup plan" even if the Supreme Court pushes back on their approach. This suggests they've war-gamed potential legal challenges and have alternative regulatory pathways ready to deploy.
For markets, this kind of policy flexibility creates uncertainty. Tariff adjustments can shift capital flows overnight, impact corporate earnings across sectors, and alter risk appetite for both traditional and digital assets. Worth monitoring how this plays out.