An asset management firm just fired off a warning shot at one of Wall Street's most powerful index providers. The clash? Whether companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets deserve a spot in major market benchmarks.
Strive Asset Management challenged MSCI's recent proposal that could effectively penalize corporations treating Bitcoin as a treasury reserve. The index giant suggested excluding or downweighting firms with significant crypto holdings - a move that could reshape how institutional investors view digital assets.
What's at stake goes beyond a single policy shift. If MSCI pushes through this framework, companies like MicroStrategy and others betting on BTC as a strategic reserve might face index exclusion. That means passive funds tracking MSCI benchmarks would automatically dump these stocks, regardless of their actual business performance.
The confrontation highlights a deeper tension: traditional finance gatekeepers still treating crypto exposure as a risk factor rather than a legitimate treasury strategy. While some corporations see Bitcoin as digital gold for their balance sheets, legacy index providers apparently haven't gotten the memo.
This standoff could set precedent for how Wall Street's infrastructure adapts - or resists - the integration of digital assets into corporate finance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BankruptWorker
· 12-05 17:23
Here they come again, these old-timers are still stubbornly holding their ground.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoi
· 12-05 17:21
MSCI is being ridiculous this time, directly sidelining companies that hold BTC as assets? Traditional finance really does see itself as the gatekeeper.
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquid
· 12-05 17:19
MSCI’s move this time is really something else. What are they so afraid of? It’s not like Bitcoin is going to bite anyone.
Companies holding are getting dumped on—the truth is, traditional finance is still inexperienced.
MicroStrategy might be in real trouble now... forced to take a loss.
Wait a minute, isn’t this basically a disguised ban? That’s a really sneaky move.
Web3 still has a few years to go before it becomes mainstream; these gatekeepers are just too stubborn.
Let’s just watch how these old money folks struggle against the times.
Strive really slapped MSCI in the face this time—finally, someone dares to stand up.
Honestly, if they really go through with the exclusion, that’s just pure market manipulation, isn’t it?
Bitcoin as treasury will get recognized sooner or later—it’s just a matter of time...
These index providers are still looking at crypto with a 90s mindset, it’s kind of 😤
An asset management firm just fired off a warning shot at one of Wall Street's most powerful index providers. The clash? Whether companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets deserve a spot in major market benchmarks.
Strive Asset Management challenged MSCI's recent proposal that could effectively penalize corporations treating Bitcoin as a treasury reserve. The index giant suggested excluding or downweighting firms with significant crypto holdings - a move that could reshape how institutional investors view digital assets.
What's at stake goes beyond a single policy shift. If MSCI pushes through this framework, companies like MicroStrategy and others betting on BTC as a strategic reserve might face index exclusion. That means passive funds tracking MSCI benchmarks would automatically dump these stocks, regardless of their actual business performance.
The confrontation highlights a deeper tension: traditional finance gatekeepers still treating crypto exposure as a risk factor rather than a legitimate treasury strategy. While some corporations see Bitcoin as digital gold for their balance sheets, legacy index providers apparently haven't gotten the memo.
This standoff could set precedent for how Wall Street's infrastructure adapts - or resists - the integration of digital assets into corporate finance.