Yesterday's podcast hit a snag when we dug into ownership coins—specifically Loyal's mechanics.
The buyback proposal caught our attention. Main driver? Apparently their treasury's basically sitting there like an open arbitrage play for hostile capital. The team's argument centers on defense—they're trying to wall off that treasury before someone exploits the gap.
Still wrestling with how this connects to the broader ownership model though. Incomplete thought, but worth tracking.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWallflower
· 10h ago
This whole buyback defense... it still feels like just patching leaks, the fundamental problem hasn't been solved at all.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 10h ago
The obvious gap in loyal's treasury only gets addressed when something goes wrong... classic armchair quarterbacking.
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 10h ago
ngl loyal's treasury defense move feels like closing the barn door after the horse already got liquidated... seen this playbook before and it rarely ends well lol
Yesterday's podcast hit a snag when we dug into ownership coins—specifically Loyal's mechanics.
The buyback proposal caught our attention. Main driver? Apparently their treasury's basically sitting there like an open arbitrage play for hostile capital. The team's argument centers on defense—they're trying to wall off that treasury before someone exploits the gap.
Still wrestling with how this connects to the broader ownership model though. Incomplete thought, but worth tracking.