2025-12-05 13:22:10

The fate of #数字货币市场洞察 stablecoins varies dramatically across countries. In some places, they're directly labeled as illegal; in others, they're welcomed with federal licenses; and in some cases, even sovereign wealth funds are getting involved.

Take the US GNIS Act, for example: it requires full 1:1 backing with real assets or US Treasuries, and both the CEO and CFO must sign off on the data—if something goes wrong, they're legally liable. This level of strictness stands in stark contrast to outright bans in certain jurisdictions.

$UNI $ASTER Holders of these types of assets need to be cautious, as compliance thresholds vary greatly between regions. What’s legal in location A today could become a regulatory violation in location B tomorrow. Market fragmentation is now a reality, so before making cross-border transfers, be sure to understand the local regulations to avoid running afoul of regulatory blind spots.

UNI-7.33%

ASTER-3.49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SurvivorshipBias

· 1h ago

Honestly, this thing is really all over the place, you really have to be careful. --- I think the US requirements are okay, at least they're transparent, unlike some places where things just get banned outright. --- Almost got into trouble holding coins across jurisdictions, you really need to do your homework beforehand. --- Even sovereign wealth funds are getting involved, which shows stablecoins are definitely a trend, it's just the fragmented regulation that's a bit annoying. --- Having the CEO sign off personally is just absurd, feels like they're shifting the risk. --- I've become more and more cautious holding UNI during this period, policy changes really catch you off guard. --- Regulation is such a mess, it's exhausting for users if things keep going like this.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 17h ago

Playing with stablecoins is just like gambling, depends on the place... Some countries ban them outright, while others hand out licenses and pour in heavy investments. It’s surreal. That CEO signature thing... the US move is tough, shifting the risk onto the executives. If it were me, I’d have run long ago. By the way, for those holding UNI and ASTER, shouldn’t you hurry up and check your local regulations? One cross-border transfer and you might be violating the law. The fragmentation in this market is just ridiculous. Are sovereign wealth funds getting involved now? Does that mean stablecoins are officially recognized? The rules are just too chaotic. Who can handle such a big compliance gap? Legal today, illegal tomorrow—how are you supposed to do business like this?

View OriginalReply0

GreenCandleCollector

· 17h ago

This set of combination punches from the US is really ruthless. The CEO has to sign and put their stamp on it? It's kind of like playing a game of "I bet on myself"... But on the other hand, does this actually make things more reassuring? At least it's not a black box operation, right? Switching to another angle... Both are stablecoins, so why are some places handing out death sentences while others are opening their arms wide? How big is this difference? Before making a cross-border transfer, you have to check the rules first. Sounds simple, but in reality... just figuring out all these regulations is exhausting. Who can remember the compliance thresholds for so many countries around the world? I just want to ask: how careful do you have to be to hold UNI and ASTER? Could you become non-compliant overnight just by missing a detail?

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 17h ago

The US's 1:1 collateralization system is really absurd. The CEO even has to sign off and take the blame—who would dare to get involved? Cross-border business is truly a pitfall—it's legal today and illegal tomorrow. I'm scared. With GNIS coming out, are the good days for stablecoins over...? Fragmented regulation is just a way to fleece retail investors, with everyone playing by their own rules. With compliance thresholds being such a mess, I'll just keep holding my coins and wait and see. This time the US is really ruthless. Europe is starting to follow suit too—stablecoins have no way out.

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 17h ago

Oh no, this is bad. I'm still holding UNI, and now I have to worry about compliance issues again... But on the other hand, strict regulation is actually a good thing; it means this is really going mainstream. I'm all in and holding on; don't miss the last chance to buy more. I just don't believe I won't break even this time.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 17h ago

Haha, this is the surreal reality of Web3... A token can be legal in the US, but suddenly becomes illegal somewhere else? You really have to be careful, especially if you’re a whale. Regulation is as unreliable as a weather forecast. That whole CEO signing liability thing is brutal—if something goes wrong, you go straight to jail. No wonder so many projects are hiding like turtles. Cross-border stuff is definitely a trap. You need to do your homework, or you’ll get caught in a regulatory gray area. This market fragmentation issue will have to be unified sooner or later, otherwise nobody can do business properly.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
271.84K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
68.38K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
8.85K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
10.16K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
11.26K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
IBVMIBVM
MC:$0.1Holders:0
0.00%
2
MOONMoon
MC:$3.7KHolders:4
0.83%
3
一姐天天发一姐天天发
MC:$3.51KHolders:1
0.00%
4
GSUNGSUN
MC:$3.58KHolders:2
0.00%
5
minerminer
MC:$3.5KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap