Lately, I’ve been focusing on Web3 payments, and the more I look into it, the more I feel: compliance shouldn’t be seen as a limitation—it’s actually the key to unlocking large-scale adoption.
This approach is pretty evident with BlazPay Labs. They treat compliance as infrastructure while also keeping up on the tech side—the idea is to enable crypto payments to truly reach mass adoption.
To be honest, in the payments space, you can’t succeed with just technology, and compliance alone isn’t enough either. You need both to go the distance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainArchaeologist
· 12h ago
That's absolutely right. Compliance is really overcomplicated by many people; in fact, it's just a ticket to enter.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 12-05 12:54
This advice should indeed be heeded—compliance should have long been seen as an opportunity, not a shackle.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 12-05 12:50
Compliance is definitely important, but the real question is, when will authorities in China actually ease up?
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 12-05 12:45
Compliance really needs to be taken seriously, otherwise everything else is pointless.
Lately, I’ve been focusing on Web3 payments, and the more I look into it, the more I feel: compliance shouldn’t be seen as a limitation—it’s actually the key to unlocking large-scale adoption.
This approach is pretty evident with BlazPay Labs. They treat compliance as infrastructure while also keeping up on the tech side—the idea is to enable crypto payments to truly reach mass adoption.
To be honest, in the payments space, you can’t succeed with just technology, and compliance alone isn’t enough either. You need both to go the distance.