Late last year, a major exchange's newly appointed co-leader shared some thoughts on what really matters for women climbing the ladder in this industry. The conversation happened at a gathering focused on female professionals, and the message was pretty straightforward—forget about asking for special treatment based on gender.
According to this executive, whether you're building in traditional tech or diving deep into crypto, what sets you apart isn't your background. It's what you bring to the table. Skills, execution, and how you handle pressure when markets go sideways—that's the stuff that counts.
The take? Commercial battlegrounds don't care about demographics. They care about results. Women succeeding in Web3 aren't doing it because companies are cutting them slack. They're doing it because they're damn good at what they do. From protocol development to community building, from trading strategies to regulatory navigation—excellence speaks for itself.
It's an interesting perspective, especially in an industry that loves to talk about inclusivity. But maybe the real inclusion isn't about lowering bars. Maybe it's about recognizing talent regardless of who's bringing it. When you're negotiating partnerships worth millions or making split-second decisions during liquidity crunches, competence is the only currency that matters.
What do you think? Does the crypto space need more conversations like this, or are we missing something bigger about how we build truly diverse teams?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTBlackHole
· 14h ago
It sounds great, but what’s the reality... There are still too few women who can make it in crypto—not because the bars are high, but because there are fewer opportunities from the very start.
I think what this person said is correct but incomplete. Of course, being capable is important, but the real question is: what kind of women get noticed and are given opportunities to prove themselves?
To be honest, there shouldn’t be special treatment, but we also can’t deny that systemic bias exists. True diversity isn’t just about slogans; it needs to start at the source, like VC investment and attention from key opinion leaders.
This rhetoric sounds nice, but what I really want to see is real change with actual money behind it.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatcher
· 15h ago
NGL, this kind of talk sounds very passionate, but the reality is that some people start from a different starting line... Of course ability is important, but the question is whether you'll even be given the opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 15h ago
Sounds good, but I just want to ask... is it really true? The market is indeed ruthless, but the unfairness of the mechanism is also very real.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 15h ago
That's pretty straightforward, but I think there's an issue here... Competence is important, no doubt, but systemic inequality of opportunity is also a real thing. Competence is king, but the premise is that you have to actually get the chance to play.
Late last year, a major exchange's newly appointed co-leader shared some thoughts on what really matters for women climbing the ladder in this industry. The conversation happened at a gathering focused on female professionals, and the message was pretty straightforward—forget about asking for special treatment based on gender.
According to this executive, whether you're building in traditional tech or diving deep into crypto, what sets you apart isn't your background. It's what you bring to the table. Skills, execution, and how you handle pressure when markets go sideways—that's the stuff that counts.
The take? Commercial battlegrounds don't care about demographics. They care about results. Women succeeding in Web3 aren't doing it because companies are cutting them slack. They're doing it because they're damn good at what they do. From protocol development to community building, from trading strategies to regulatory navigation—excellence speaks for itself.
It's an interesting perspective, especially in an industry that loves to talk about inclusivity. But maybe the real inclusion isn't about lowering bars. Maybe it's about recognizing talent regardless of who's bringing it. When you're negotiating partnerships worth millions or making split-second decisions during liquidity crunches, competence is the only currency that matters.
What do you think? Does the crypto space need more conversations like this, or are we missing something bigger about how we build truly diverse teams?