Spent the past week testing out this private subnet to public L1 architecture flow, and honestly? This might be the first onchain infrastructure that genuinely meets institutional requirements instead of just optimizing for transaction speed.
What caught my attention: Private VENs (Virtual Execution Networks) enforce compliance rules and deliver zero-knowledge privacy exactly where institutions need it most. Then the system bridges to public L1 when transparency is required.
The dual-layer approach actually solves the classic blockchain trilemma from an enterprise angle - you get privacy for sensitive operations without sacrificing the verifiability benefits of public chains. No more choosing between regulatory compliance and decentralization.
Most infra projects chase TPS numbers. This one tackled the unsexy compliance layer first, which ironically might be what unlocks real institutional adoption.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MagicBean
· 23h ago
Someone is finally taking NGL compliance seriously; those previous projects were just playing the TPS numbers game... This dual-layer design is actually pretty impressive.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 23h ago
Hmm... Compliance is indeed the last mile for institutional entry, but how long this dual-layer structure can last depends on the results of future security audits. Let's hope it's not just another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 23h ago
Damn, finally someone has really figured out compliance... Previously, those projects were all just hyping up TPS numbers, but this guy is directly targeting the real pain points of institutions. He definitely has something going on.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 23h ago
ngl this is the real deal, finally someone isn’t just hyping up TPS. Compliance may not sound sexy, but it’s truly the threshold for institutions to enter.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 23h ago
Finally, someone is not just hyping up TPS; compliance is actually the real sticking point for institutions.
Spent the past week testing out this private subnet to public L1 architecture flow, and honestly? This might be the first onchain infrastructure that genuinely meets institutional requirements instead of just optimizing for transaction speed.
What caught my attention: Private VENs (Virtual Execution Networks) enforce compliance rules and deliver zero-knowledge privacy exactly where institutions need it most. Then the system bridges to public L1 when transparency is required.
The dual-layer approach actually solves the classic blockchain trilemma from an enterprise angle - you get privacy for sensitive operations without sacrificing the verifiability benefits of public chains. No more choosing between regulatory compliance and decentralization.
Most infra projects chase TPS numbers. This one tackled the unsexy compliance layer first, which ironically might be what unlocks real institutional adoption.