To be honest, I really don't understand how the HYPE project is still holding on.
A product with less than 10,000 daily active users should have died out long ago. What strikes me as the most absurd thing about this cycle is that—no matter who hypes it up, compared to already quiet projects like GMX and DYDX, HYPE hasn't really brought any substantial innovation.
The Achilles' heel of on-chain contract exchanges is actually quite obvious: the pool for new users is too shallow, there are very few and very narrow channels for acquiring users, and the conversion rate is pitifully low. DYDX and GMX failed back then, essentially because they fell at these hurdles. Now HYPE is still following the same old path, so why do they think they can survive?
The market doesn't buy into sentiment; the data speaks for itself. What should go to zero will eventually go to zero.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainDetective
· 11h ago
Daily active users are less than 10,000 and they're still holding on? I checked the on-chain wallet cluster transfer records—there must be institutions providing liquidity behind the scenes, otherwise it would have gone to zero by now. This is exactly how GMX died back then, and now HYPE is just copying and pasting the same path...
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 13h ago
Daily active users are less than 10,000 and they're still bragging, I really can't take it anymore, haha.
Forget it, not going to look anymore. It's obvious what's going on at a glance.
This round of HYPE is just a bubble inflated by hype men, right?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeir
· 13h ago
It should be pointed out that on-chain data indicates that HYPE’s daily active user dilemma is not a coincidence—this precisely validates the core argument I made in "The DEX Dilemma: The Endgame of Liquidity Fragmentation." The decline of GMX and DYDX is essentially an inevitable process of value consensus collapse, and HYPE is simply repeating the same script.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 13h ago
Oh my god, daily active users are less than 10,000 and they're still hyping it up. This thing is really unbelievable.
Isn't it just GMX with a different name? Why shouldn't it go to zero?
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 13h ago
Something with less than 10,000 daily active users, and you call that carrying the project?
---
GMX and DYDX both died the same way. What makes HYPE think it can pull off a miracle comeback...
---
The user acquisition pool is so shallow, and the conversion rate is abysmally low. To put it nicely, it's a problem with the model.
---
Sentiment? The market stopped buying into that a long time ago. If it’s meant to go to zero, it will go to zero.
---
Watching a bunch of people hype up HYPE just reminds me of the GMX fiasco back in the day...
---
As for on-chain exchanges, I don't see HYPE doing anything different.
---
To be honest, there’s nothing to argue about in front of the data. Either bring innovation or wait to die.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 14h ago
Damn, daily active users are less than 10,000 and you still dare to brag? Isn't this just a copy of GMX? You didn't learn the essence, you only learned how to exploit retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 14h ago
Daily active users are less than 10,000, and they’re still hyping this? Looks like the final frenzy of a Ponzi scheme to me.
Honestly, HYPE is just a copy-paste of GMX without any innovation. Why should it survive?
It's only a matter of time before it goes to zero—data doesn't lie.
The most surreal thing about this cycle is that there are still people willing to buy into these kinds of projects. I just don't get it.
To be honest, I really don't understand how the HYPE project is still holding on.
A product with less than 10,000 daily active users should have died out long ago. What strikes me as the most absurd thing about this cycle is that—no matter who hypes it up, compared to already quiet projects like GMX and DYDX, HYPE hasn't really brought any substantial innovation.
The Achilles' heel of on-chain contract exchanges is actually quite obvious: the pool for new users is too shallow, there are very few and very narrow channels for acquiring users, and the conversion rate is pitifully low. DYDX and GMX failed back then, essentially because they fell at these hurdles. Now HYPE is still following the same old path, so why do they think they can survive?
The market doesn't buy into sentiment; the data speaks for itself. What should go to zero will eventually go to zero.