This move really makes things clear—it’s not that they weren’t going to donate, they just weren’t in a hurry to do it until they got caught.
It’s just like saying “I didn’t study at all” before an exam, but then being the first to finish the test. The passiveness is just awkward.
Sure, the 200,000 was eventually made up, but how do you make up for that “hindsight-driven conscience”? These days, everyone knows how much a promise is really worth.
At the end of the day, trust is the most valuable thing in a community. Once it’s broken, it’s broken—nothing can glue it back together.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 12h ago
This is a typical "wait and see which way the wind blows before speaking" routine—at first, they pretend to be magnanimous, but as soon as the community makes a fuss, they immediately back down.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 12h ago
Only after being exposed do they make up for it? That's ridiculous. What happened to the promised conviction?
This move really makes things clear—it’s not that they weren’t going to donate, they just weren’t in a hurry to do it until they got caught.
It’s just like saying “I didn’t study at all” before an exam, but then being the first to finish the test. The passiveness is just awkward.
Sure, the 200,000 was eventually made up, but how do you make up for that “hindsight-driven conscience”? These days, everyone knows how much a promise is really worth.
At the end of the day, trust is the most valuable thing in a community. Once it’s broken, it’s broken—nothing can glue it back together.